Immune checkpoint inhibitors before lung cancer surgery show acceptable safety profile
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed surgical outcomes in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant or perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy, with or without chemotherapy. The analysis included data from multiple studies with a total of 2691 patients. The authors examined several surgical endpoints including intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, pneumonectomy rate, utilization of minimally invasive surgery, conversion rate, and surgical delays.
The pooled results showed a low rate of intraoperative complications and postoperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in a modest proportion of patients. Pneumonectomy was performed in a minority of cases, and minimally invasive surgery was utilized in nearly half of resections. The conversion rate from minimally invasive to open surgery was notable, and surgical delays were observed in a small percentage of patients.
The authors did not report specific limitations or funding sources. The findings suggest that surgery following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients, but distinct perioperative challenges exist. Differing risk profiles between treatments underscore the need for multidisciplinary coordination, experienced thoracic surgeons, and treatment centralization. Clinicians should interpret these results cautiously given the lack of reported study limitations and the observational nature of the included data.