Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Immune checkpoint inhibitors before lung cancer surgery show acceptable safety profile

Immune checkpoint inhibitors before lung cancer surgery show acceptable safety profile
Photo by Europeana / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with acceptable surgical safety in resectable NSCLC, but multidisciplinary planning is essential.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed surgical outcomes in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant or perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy, with or without chemotherapy. The analysis included data from multiple studies with a total of 2691 patients. The authors examined several surgical endpoints including intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, pneumonectomy rate, utilization of minimally invasive surgery, conversion rate, and surgical delays.

The pooled results showed a low rate of intraoperative complications and postoperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in a modest proportion of patients. Pneumonectomy was performed in a minority of cases, and minimally invasive surgery was utilized in nearly half of resections. The conversion rate from minimally invasive to open surgery was notable, and surgical delays were observed in a small percentage of patients.

The authors did not report specific limitations or funding sources. The findings suggest that surgery following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients, but distinct perioperative challenges exist. Differing risk profiles between treatments underscore the need for multidisciplinary coordination, experienced thoracic surgeons, and treatment centralization. Clinicians should interpret these results cautiously given the lack of reported study limitations and the observational nature of the included data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 2,691
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has markedly improved pathological response and survival. However, the effect of ICI-based regimens on surgical feasibility, complexity, and perioperative safety remains uncertain. This study aimed to systematically evaluate surgical outcomes following neoadjuvant or perioperative ICI-based therapy, with or without chemotherapy. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science was conducted from database inception to January 2025 according to PRISMA guidelines. Only prospective single-arm and randomized controlled trials reporting surgical outcomes after ICI-based regimens in resectable NSCLC were included. Pooled event proportions (EP) were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis with Freeman-Tukey transformation. Meta-regression analyses compared chemo-immunotherapy (CTIO) versus immunotherapy-only (IO) protocols. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eligible trials comprising 2691 patients were analyzed. The pooled EP for intraoperative complications was 0.03, postoperative complications 0.27, and postoperative mortality 0.01. Pneumonectomy was performed in 10% of cases. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was used in 47% of resections, with a 20% conversion rate and 9% surgical delays. Meta-regression revealed higher intraoperative complications and surgery omission with CTIO protocols, while IO regimens showed higher postoperative mortality. No significant differences were found in pneumonectomy rate, MIS utilization, or conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery following ICI-based therapy is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients but presents distinct perioperative challenges. Differing risk profiles between treatments underscore the need for multidisciplinary coordination, experienced thoracic surgeons, and treatment centralization in resectable NSCLC within the immunotherapy era.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.