Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Higher Ventilatory Ratio values are associated with increased mortality risk in patients with acute respiratory distress syndromeVentilatory Ratio Linked to Higher Death Risk in ARDS

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that higher Ventilatory Ratio values correlate with increased mortality in ARDS, but evidence certainty is currently low.

This systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis synthesized data from 17 observational studies to evaluate the relationship between Ventilatory Ratio (VR) and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The analysis found that higher VR values were associated with an increased mortality risk, reporting a mean effect size of 1.55 (95% credible interval: 1.27-1.96).

The authors noted significant limitations in the data, including moderate-to-high heterogeneity across the included studies (tau = 0.41, I = 71.9%). Consequently, the overall certainty of the evidence was rated as low using the GRADE approach. These factors suggest that while a correlation exists, the strength of the association is not firmly established.

Clinically, VR may serve as a complementary prognostic marker for ARDS patients. However, because the findings are based on observational data and suffer from high heterogeneity, prospective studies are necessary to validate the performance of VR and determine its incremental value over established indices like PaO2/FiO2.

How this fits prior evidence

This finding addresses a gap in identifying prognostic markers for acute respiratory distress syndrome. While prior evidence noted that lung ultrasound shows good diagnostic accuracy for ARDS, this meta-analysis adds a specific physiological metric (Ventilatory Ratio) as a potential indicator of mortality risk. However, the low certainty of evidence and high heterogeneity mean it does not yet replace established clinical indicators.

A new analysis of 17 studies suggests that a simple breathing measurement called the ventilatory ratio (VR) may help predict death risk in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is a serious lung condition that often requires a ventilator to help patients breathe. Researchers found that higher VR values were linked to a 55% higher risk of death, with a 95% credible interval of 1.27 to 1.96.

However, the evidence is not strong enough to change practice yet. The analysis showed moderate-to-high variation across studies, and the overall certainty of the evidence was rated as low using the GRADE system. This means the link between VR and mortality is uncertain and could change with more research.

No safety concerns were reported in the studies. The ventilatory ratio is a noninvasive measure that can be calculated from standard ventilator settings, so it is easy to obtain. But doctors should not rely on VR alone to make decisions about patient care.

For now, VR is a promising but unproven tool. More prospective studies are needed to confirm whether it adds value to existing measures like the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Patients and families should discuss any concerns about ARDS treatment with their healthcare team.

What this means for you:
Higher ventilatory ratio may signal higher death risk in ARDS, but evidence is low certainty.

Common questions

What is the ventilatory ratio?

The ventilatory ratio is a simple breathing measurement calculated from standard ventilator settings. It helps assess how well the lungs are exchanging gases in patients on mechanical ventilation.

How much does a higher VR increase death risk?

The analysis found that higher VR values were associated with a 55% higher risk of death, with a 95% credible interval of 1.27 to 1.96. But the evidence is low certainty.

Should doctors use VR to guide treatment?

Not yet. The evidence is low certainty due to variation across studies. VR may be a complementary marker, but more research is needed before it can be used in routine care.

What are the limitations of this study?

The analysis had moderate-to-high heterogeneity across studies, and the overall certainty of evidence was low. This means the results should be interpreted cautiously.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The ventilatory ratio (VR) has been proposed as a simple and accessible index to estimate ventilatory inefficiency and physiological dead space in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, its association with mortality remains controversial, partly due to the methodological heterogeneity of the published studies. METHODS: A systematic review and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis were conducted to assess the association between VR and mortality in patients with ARDS. Observational studies reporting crude or adjusted odds ratios (OR) that analysed the association between VR and mortality were included. The search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and LILACS databases up to April 2025. Bayesian model, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were applied. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's test. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024538654). RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were identified, of which 17 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The pooled OR for the association between VR and mortality was 1.55 (95% credible interval: 1.27-1.96), with moderate-to-high heterogeneity (τ = 0.41, I = 71.9%). Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings across different model specifications and study characteristics. Risk of bias was rated as moderate in 3 studies and low in 20, according to the QUIPS tool, and the overall certainty of the evidence was rated as low using the GRADE approach. CONCLUSIONS: Higher VR values were associated with increased mortality risk in patients with ARDS. However, moderate-to-high heterogeneity across studies indicates that these findings should be interpreted cautiously. VR may represent a complementary prognostic marker, but prospective studies are needed to validate its performance and determine its incremental value over established indices such as PaO/FiO.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.