Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Evidence-based review of transducer selection for lung ultrasound in dogs and cats with pulmonary pathology

Evidence-based review of transducer selection for lung ultrasound in dogs and cats with pulmonary pa…
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Standardize transducer selection in veterinary lung ultrasound to improve diagnostic accuracy and outcomes.

This evidence-based review evaluates transducer selection for lung ultrasound in dogs and cats presenting with pulmonary pathology. The scope includes conditions such as alveolar-interstitial syndrome, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pulmonary contusion. The review addresses secondary outcomes including B-line visualization, pleural line assessment, detection of subpleural consolidations, diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and interobserver reliability.

The authors synthesize that transducer selection remains largely operator-dependent. They highlight that limited evidence-based guidance currently exists for veterinary applications. The review does not report specific sample sizes, primary outcomes, or adverse events. The authors acknowledge these gaps in the existing literature regarding veterinary lung ultrasound practices.

The practice relevance is to standardize and optimize transducer selection in veterinary lung ultrasound. This approach aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and accelerate clinical decision-making. Ultimately, these steps are intended to enhance patient outcomes in small animal emergency and critical care environments.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Alveolar–interstitial syndrome (AIS) is a common ultrasonographic finding in dogs and cats with pulmonary pathology, including cardiogenic pulmonary edema, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pulmonary contusion. Point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a rapid, noninvasive, and repeatable diagnostic tool for identifying AIS in emergency and critical care patients. Despite its increasing clinical adoption, transducer selection remains largely operator-dependent, with limited evidence-based guidance for veterinary applications. This review synthesizes current veterinary and human literature to evaluate how transducer type influences the detection and characterization of AIS in small animals. The acoustic properties, field of view, penetration depth, and resolution trade-offs of linear, curvilinear, and microconvex transducers are discussed in relation to B-line visualization, pleural line assessment, and detection of subpleural consolidations. Comparative performance data, including the results of recent veterinary studies, are integrated to highlight differences in diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability. A clinical decision-making framework is proposed, outlining optimal transducer selection by patient size, suspected pathology, and clinical context (triage, monitoring, follow-up). Practical considerations such as transducer availability, equipment ergonomics, and operator training are addressed. Knowledge gaps and future research priorities, including the role of portable devices and AI-assisted image interpretation, are identified. By consolidating the available evidence, this review aims to standardize and optimize transducer selection in veterinary lung ultrasound, improving diagnostic accuracy, accelerating clinical decision-making, and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in small animal emergency and critical care.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.