Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Atezolizumab with SBRT fails to improve survival in early NSCLCTrial shows atezolizumab plus SBRT does not improve lung cancer survival

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Atezolizumab plus SBRT did not improve overall survival in inoperable early-stage NSCLC and increased severe toxicity.

This phase 3 randomized trial evaluated whether adding atezolizumab to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with T1-T3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) up to 7 cm who were medically inoperable or declined surgery and had at least one risk factor for recurrence. The trial enrolled 417 patients across 146 US institutions, randomly assigning 210 to atezolizumab plus SBRT and 207 to SBRT alone.

At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, overall survival showed no improvement with the combination. The hazard ratio was 1.04 (95% CI 0.69-1.58; one-sided p=0.58). Estimated 2-year overall survival was 82% in both groups (95% CI 75-87).

Safety analyses revealed higher toxicity with the combination. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 12% of patients receiving atezolizumab plus SBRT versus 3% with SBRT alone. Two grade 5 respiratory events occurred in the atezolizumab group.

The trial was closed to new participants at the first interim analysis for futility. These findings do not support adding atezolizumab to SBRT in this population and highlight the need for alternative strategies in early-stage, inoperable NSCLC.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in the management of inoperable early-stage NSCLC by evaluating the addition of immunotherapy to SBRT. It differs from the finding that atezolizumab and lurbinectedin combinations show potential for superior progression-free survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, as this trial focused on early-stage NSCLC and showed no survival benefit for the atezolizumab combination.

Researchers conducted a large phase 3 trial to see if adding the immunotherapy drug atezolizumab to SBRT radiation improved survival for patients with inoperable, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. The study included 417 patients who were not candidates for surgery and had at least one risk factor for cancer recurrence.

The results showed no improvement in overall survival for patients who received atezolizumab combined with SBRT compared to those who received SBRT alone. Both groups showed an estimated 2-year overall survival rate of 82%. While the treatment was used, the study was closed early because the data did not show a significant benefit.

Safety data showed that the combination of atezolizumab and SBRT led to more severe side effects. Specifically, 12% of patients in the combination group experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, compared to 3% in the group receiving only SBRT. Two serious respiratory events occurred in the group receiving both treatments. Patients should discuss these findings and their specific treatment options with their oncology team.

What this means for you:
The trial found no survival benefit for adding atezolizumab to SBRT for inoperable early-stage lung cancer.

Common questions

Did the drug atezolizumab help patients live longer?

The study found no improvement in overall survival for patients who received atezolizumab combined with SBRT compared to those who received SBRT alone. Both groups had an estimated 2-year overall survival rate of 82%.

What were the side effects of the combination treatment?

The combination of atezolizumab and SBRT resulted in more severe side effects. The rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 12% for the combination group, while it was only 3% for the group receiving SBRT alone.

Who was included in this study?

The study included 417 patients with inoperable, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. These patients were either medically unable to have surgery or chose not to have it, and they had at least one risk factor for cancer recurrence.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 210
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up96.0 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for early-stage, medically inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to test the addition of neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant atezolizumab with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, eligible patients from 146 institutions across the USA who had T1-T3N0M0 NSCLC ≤7 cm, and were medically inoperable or declined surgery, and had at least one risk factor suggestive of increased risk of recurrence, were included in the study. Patients underwent open-label equal and stratified randomisation to SBRT over three to eight fractions with or without up to eight cycles of neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every 21 days for up to eight cycles, with SBRT initiated with cycle three. The primary objective was to compare overall survival between the two groups. The group sequential design included four interim analyses. Target accrual was 480 patients (432 eligible). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04214262) and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between March 25, 2020, and Sept 9, 2024, 417 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to atezolizumab plus SBRT (n=210) or SBRT alone (n=207). 402 were eligible and made up the modified intention-to-treat population (201 per group). The median age was 72·8 years (IQR 67·4-78·4), 218 (54%) of 402 participants were female, and 184 (46%) were male. Accrual closed at the first interim analysis of all randomly assigned participants for futility with 76 progression-free survival (PFS) events and 41 deaths among 400 eligible participants (200 per group). An updated analysis was performed with 140 PFS events, 92 deaths, and a median of 24·8 months (range 0·1-64·9; IQR 18·6-36·0) of follow-up among living patients. The overall survival hazard ratio was 1·04 (95% CI 0·69-1·58; one-sided p=0·58). Estimated 2-year overall survival was 82% in both groups (95% CI 75-87). Grade 3 or higher adverse event rates were 12% with atezolizumab plus SBRT and 3% with SBRT. Two grade 5 respiratory events occurred in the atezolizumab plus SBRT group. INTERPRETATION: In the first fully reported phase 3 cooperative group trial to assess immunotherapy in inoperable early-stage NSCLC, we observed no improvement in overall survival with atezolizumab plus SBRT, and more grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported with atezolizumab combined with SBRT. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, US National Cancer Institute, and Genentech.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.