Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

BAFF and APRIL signaling pathways drive pathogenic autoantibody production in IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritisBiologic Therapies Target Specific Pathways in Kidney Diseases

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that BAFF and APRIL pathways drive autoantibody production in IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritis.

This systematic review evaluates the role of the BAFF and APRIL signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and primary membranous nephropathy. The review identifies that aberrant activation of these pathways drives autoreactive B cells to produce pathogenic autoantibodies, specifically Gd-IgA1, anti-dsDNA, and anti-PLA2R.

A key finding is the distinction in pathway predominance: APRIL appears more prominent in IgA nephropathy, while BAFF targeted strategies are more frequently utilized in lupus nephritis and primary membranous nephropathy. However, the authors note that this distinction is based on cross-trial comparisons and is currently a preliminary working hypothesis.

Clinical integration of biologic agents like belimumab and telitacicept is occurring for these conditions. However, the lack of direct head-to-head trials to validate the specific roles of BAFF versus APRIL means the evidence for choosing one specific pathway over another remains preliminary. The findings suggest a need for further validation to confirm these preliminary hypotheses.

How this fits prior evidence

This review addresses a gap in the understanding of specific signaling pathways in renal diseases. It complements existing evidence for telitacicept in SLE and rituximab-based therapy in relapsing lupus nephritis by identifying the underlying BAFF and APRIL mechanisms. While previous coverage established the efficacy of telitacicept 160 mg plus standard therapy for SRI-4 response in adults with active SLE, this review provides a mechanistic overview of the pathways these biologics target.

Researchers reviewed how certain medications, such as belimumab and telitacicept, work to treat kidney conditions like IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and primary membranous nephropathy. These drugs target the BAFF and APRIL signaling pathways to stop the body from producing harmful autoantibodies.

The review found that different conditions may involve different pathways. For example, the APRIL pathway seems more involved in IgA nephropathy. In contrast, treatments targeting the BAFF pathway are more common for lupus nephritis and primary membranous nephropathy.

It is important to note that the specific differences between these pathways are currently considered preliminary hypotheses. Because these findings come from comparing different studies rather than a direct head-to-head trial, more research is needed to confirm these specific links. These therapies are beginning to be used in clinical practice, but patients should talk to their doctors about the best options for their specific condition.

What this means for you:
Biologic therapies target specific immune pathways to manage different types of kidney diseases.

Common questions

What are the specific medications being used for these kidney conditions?

The medications mentioned in the review are belimumab and telitacicept. These are biologic agents that target the BAFF and APRIL signaling pathways. They are being integrated into clinical practice to treat IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and primary membranous nephropathy by addressing the production of harmful autoantibodies.

How do these treatments differ for different kidney diseases?

The research suggests that different diseases may involve different pathways. Specifically, the APRIL pathway appears more prominent in IgA nephropathy. Meanwhile, treatments targeting the BAFF pathway are more frequently used for lupus nephritis and primary membranous nephropathy. However, these specific differences are currently considered preliminary working hypotheses.

Is the research on these pathways conclusive?

The findings regarding which pathway is more dominant in specific diseases are not yet fully confirmed. Because these observations come from comparing different trials rather than direct head-to-head studies, they are considered preliminary. More direct trials are needed to validate these specific pathway differences before they can be fully confirmed.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BAFF and APRIL, members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily, regulate not only B-cell survival, differentiation, and antibody production but also the differentiation of T-cell subsets through binding to their receptors BAFF-R, TACI, and BCMA. In autoimmune nephropathies, aberrant activation of the BAFF/APRIL signaling pathway drives autoreactive B cells to produce pathogenic autoantibodies, including Gd-IgA1, anti-dsDNA, and anti-PLA2R, which subsequently form immune complexes, deposit in the kidney, and trigger renal tissue injury. Although conventional immunosuppressive therapies can control disease progression to some extent, their adverse effects remain a concern that cannot be overlooked. In recent years, biologic agents targeting this pathway, such as belimumab and telitacicept, have demonstrated favorable efficacy and are gradually being integrated into clinical practice. This review focuses on IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and primary membranous nephropathy, systematically summarizing the pathogenic mechanisms of the BAFF/APRIL axis and the corresponding biologic therapies in these three disease entities, while also discussing current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Of note, in analyzing the available clinical data, we observed that APRIL appears to be predominate in IgA nephropathy, whereas BAFF targeted strategies are more frequently employed in lupus nephritis and primary membranous nephropathy. These differences, however, are based on cross-trial comparisons and should be regarded as a preliminary working hypothesis requiring validation by direct head-to-head trials.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.