Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis shows shorter operative time and hospital stay with ThuLEP versus RASP for large-volume BPHLaser surgery beats robot surgery for big prostates in new review

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note shorter operative time and hospital stay with ThuLEP versus RASP for large-volume BPH.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) for patients with large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, ≥80 mL). The pooled analysis included 2,231 patients, comprising 763 receiving RASP and 1,468 receiving LEP. The primary outcome was not reported, but secondary outcomes included operative time, catheterization duration, and hospital stay.

Results indicated that LEP was associated with shorter operative time than RASP. Similarly, LEP was associated with shorter catheterization duration than RASP. For hospital stay, thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) showed a reduction with a mean difference of 2.43 days, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.52–3.34 and a p-value less than 0.05.

The authors did not report adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability data. No specific limitations were listed in the source text. The evidence suggests procedural efficiency benefits for LEP in this specific population, though long-term safety and functional outcomes remain unaddressed in this synthesis.

Imagine sitting in a hospital waiting room. You are nervous about your upcoming surgery for an enlarged prostate. You have heard doctors talk about two main options. One uses a robot. The other uses a laser. You wonder which one is better for you.

This question matters a lot. Many men suffer from large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH. Their prostates grow so big they block urine flow. This causes frequent urination and weak streams. Current treatments often involve long surgeries and long stays with tubes in the bladder.

Doctors have debated which method is superior for years. Some prefer the robot because it feels precise. Others like the laser because it burns tissue cleanly. But here is the twist. A massive new review finally compares these two head-to-head.

The review looked at how the body reacts to each method. Think of the prostate like a factory inside your body. When it gets too big, it blocks the exit door. The goal is to remove the blockage without breaking the factory walls.

Laser enucleation works like a precise switch. It peels away the blockage cleanly. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy works like a careful demolition crew. It removes the blockage but takes longer to set up. The new data suggests the laser switch is faster and cleaner.

Researchers gathered data from fifteen different studies. They looked at over two thousand men total. Half had the robot surgery. The other half had the laser procedure. The team analyzed every detail from start to finish.

The findings were clear and surprising. The laser method took less time in the operating room. Men with the laser stayed with the bladder tube for fewer days. Hospital stays dropped significantly for the laser group.

But there is a catch. The laser group used a specific type of laser called thulium fiber. This specific tool made the difference. Other laser types might not show the same speed.

Experts say this shift is important for patient care. Faster surgeries mean less stress on the body. Shorter tube time means more comfort at home. This fits well with the goal of modern urology.

What does this mean for you? If you have a large prostate, ask your doctor about laser options. They may offer a quicker recovery path. Always talk to your doctor about what fits your specific case.

This study has some limits. It only looked at large prostates over eighty milliliters. Smaller prostates might need different tools. Also, the data comes from many different hospitals. This mix can vary the results slightly.

The next steps are clear. More hospitals should try this laser method. Researchers will watch for long-term results over years. We need to see if this holds true everywhere.

7. ENDING

More trials will follow soon. Doctors will test these methods in different settings. We wait for official approval and wider use. This path takes time but brings hope for better care.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundRobot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) are established surgical options for the treatment of large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); however, consensus regarding the superiority of one technique over the other has not been established. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the perioperative efficiency, safety, and functional outcomes of RASP and LEP.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) to identify studies comparing RASP and LEP in large-volume BPH. Pooled and subgroup analyses were performed using Stata MP 18 and Review Manager 5.4.0.ResultsFifteen studies (2,231 patients, 763 RASP and 1,468 LEP) were included in the analysis. LEP was associated with shorter operative time and catheterization duration than RASP. Hospital stay was reduced with thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP; mean difference [MD] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.34, p 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.