Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review finds aerobic exercise combined with other therapies helps reduce neck pain intensity and improve physical function in adultsCombined neck pain treatments beat aerobic exercise alone

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Combined aerobic exercise with other therapies reduces neck pain better than isolated treatments, though standalone aerobic exercise showed no significant benefit.

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of aerobic exercise for adults suffering from neck pain. Researchers analyzed data from six published studies, initially screening over four thousand records to identify relevant trials. The primary focus was on measuring pain intensity and physical function outcomes.

Results indicated that aerobic exercise performed in isolation did not differ statistically from no treatment or other interventions like acupuncture. The mean difference in pain scores showed a wide confidence interval that included zero, suggesting no clear advantage for standalone aerobic activity in this specific context.

Conversely, strengthening exercises demonstrated superior effectiveness for pain reduction compared to aerobic exercise alone. Most notably, combined therapy approaches involving aerobic exercise alongside other treatments yielded significantly better results than isolated interventions. This suggests a synergistic effect when integrating different therapeutic modalities.

The evidence quality was assessed as low due to high heterogeneity across study protocols and comparisons. No adverse events or discontinuations were reported, indicating a favorable safety profile. Clinicians should consider combining aerobic exercise with other established therapies to maximize benefits for patients with neck pain.

Neck pain can stop you from moving, working, or enjoying life. A new review looked at how different treatments help adults over 18 years old. They found that aerobic exercise alone does not reduce pain intensity or improve physical function compared to doing nothing or trying other methods like acupuncture. The data showed no clear benefit for doing cardio by itself. This means relying only on walking or jogging might not be enough to feel better.

However, the results changed when people combined aerobic exercise with other therapies. Mixing these activities led to better pain relief and improved function. The review also noted that strengthening exercises worked better than aerobic exercise for pain specifically. This suggests that a mix of different approaches often works best for people suffering from neck pain.

The researchers must admit the evidence is limited and of low quality. Different studies used different methods, making it hard to draw perfect conclusions. Despite these gaps, the message is clear: combining treatments helps more than sticking to one type of exercise. Patients should talk to their doctors about mixing therapies to get the best relief.

What this means for you:
Mixing aerobic exercise with other therapies helps reduce neck pain better than doing cardio alone.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The present review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of aerobic exercise (AE) compared to other interventions in decreasing pain intensity and reducing disability in individuals with neck pain. A systematic review (SR) of randomized controlled trials was conducted. This SR was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021231231). Searches were conducted in five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane and SCOPUS). Studies were selected if they included adults over 18 years old with neck pain. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and physical function. A meta-analysis was conducted when applicable. Cochrane RoB Tool-2 was used to determine the risk of bias of included studies, and the certainty of the evidence was determined using the GRADE approach. Out of 4669 initial records screened, six studies published in 12 articles were included. AE was not statistically different compared to no-treatment or other interventions (e.g., localized exercise or acupuncture) on pain intensity measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) (mean difference (MD) [95%CI]: 5.16 mm [-6.38, 16.70]). Contrarily, strengthening exercise was better than AE for pain intensity (MD [95%CI]: -11.34 mm [-21.6, -1.09]) after treatment. However, when AE was combined with other therapy (strengthening exercises or acupuncture), the combined therapy was better than isolated treatments (MD [95%CI]: 7.71 mm [1.07, 14.35]). A high heterogeneity was observed between protocols, comparisons, and results (magnitudes and directions). In conclusion, AE had positive results only when combined with other therapies to reduce pain intensity and disability in patients with neck pain. However, the evidence is limited, low-quality, and heterogeneous.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.