Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Digitally enabled patient education tools for chronic musculoskeletal pain lack tailoring for diverse patient needsDigital tools for chronic pain need more variety for patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that most current digitally enabled education tools for musculoskeletal pain lack tailoring for diverse patient needs.

This scoping review synthesized evidence from 100 studies regarding digitally enabled patient education tools for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The review assessed various outcomes including pain intensity, self-efficacy, and quality of life. The authors noted that 81% of the included studies reported results from real-world testing and effectiveness evaluations.

Analysis of the evidence revealed significant gaps in the current landscape of digital interventions. While many tools exist, 86% of the studies did not focus on population subgroups with higher pain management needs. Furthermore, only 13 out of 39 named or unique interventions were specifically tailored to meet diverse patient needs. The majority of the evidence base originated from North America and Europe, representing 86% of the studies.

The authors conclude that there is a limited number of tools available to address diverse patient requirements. Clinical practice and future development should prioritize the creation of more inclusive and equitable digitally enabled interventions. These tools should specifically target the unmet needs of diverse populations to improve outcomes in chronic musculoskeletal pain management.

Living with chronic musculoskeletal pain can feel isolating, and many people turn to digital tools for education and support. However, a review of 100 different studies shows that these digital tools are not yet designed for everyone. While many tools exist, only a small portion are tailored to meet the diverse needs of different patient groups.

Researchers found that 86 percent of the studies were published in North America and Europe. More importantly, they found that 86 percent of the studies did not focus on specific groups who have higher needs for pain management. This means many people might not find the specific help they need in the tools currently available.

While 81 percent of the tools have been tested in real world settings, the variety is limited. Only 13 out of 39 unique interventions were actually tailored to meet diverse needs. Because many tools are not inclusive, future work needs to focus on creating more equitable options for everyone dealing with chronic pain.

What this means for you:
Most digital pain education tools are not currently tailored to meet the diverse needs of all patients.

Common questions

Are these digital tools effective for chronic pain?

The review looked at 100 studies and found that 81 percent of the tools were tested in real-world settings to see how they work. However, the study highlights that many of these tools are not yet tailored to meet the diverse needs of different types of patients.

Who is missing out on these digital tools?

The review found that 86 percent of the studies did not focus on population subgroups that have higher needs for pain management. This suggests that many people with specific needs may not find tools that work well for them.

How many unique tools are actually tailored for different needs?

Out of 39 unique interventions identified in the review, only 13 were actually tailored to meet diverse needs. This shows that while many tools exist, many are not designed to be inclusive for all patients.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Patient education is critically important for supporting self-management of chronic musculoskeletal pain, but it is unclear if and how existing tools or interventions are meeting diverse pain management needs. Therefore, this review aimed to identify and characterise digitally enabled pain education tools or interventions and explore the extent to which they meet diverse needs. We searched five electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via Ovid; Annexure A), Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL, PsycInfo and Google Scholar in January 2025, and screened articles based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. Articles were eligible if they reported on the development, evaluation and use of digitally enabled pain education tools or interventions, supporting pain self-management. Data was extracted and analysed descriptively. Our search strategy yielded 12,545 search results, out of which 100 studies were included. Majority of these studies were published in North America and Europe (n = 86; 86%) and lacked focus on population subgroups having higher pain management needs (n = 86; 86%). Out of 39 named or unique interventions, 13 tools or interventions were tailored to meet diverse needs. Most of the studies (n = 81; 81%) reported the results of real-world testing and effectiveness evaluation. There were only few studies reporting on the early development stages (i.e., co-design studies and prototype testing). For effectiveness studies, pain intensity, pain interference, pain-related knowledge, self-efficacy, function, opioid use and quality of life were commonly measured patient-reported outcomes. Although there are several digitally enabled patient education tools or interventions to support pain self-management, fewer are available to address the diverse needs. Therefore, future research and development should focus on understanding and addressing these unmet needs for developing more inclusive and equitable digitally enabled patient education interventions.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.