Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Sex differences in outcomes after stroke in NVAF with ASCVD: a post hoc analysisWomen and Men With AFib and Clogged Arteries Share Same Stroke Risk

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret these exploratory findings cautiously: no significant sex differences in outcomes were found, but the analysis is limited by small sample size and post hoc design.

This post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial examined whether sex influences cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The analysis included 222 patients, of whom 74.8% were men.

The primary composite outcome included cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, urgent revascularization for ischemia, or major bleeding within 2 years. No significant difference was observed between women and men (aOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.25-1.46; 16.1% vs. 21.1%). Secondary outcomes, including all ischemic cardiovascular events, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death, also showed no significant sex differences.

Safety outcomes, including major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage, did not differ significantly between groups. Serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported.

Key limitations include the post hoc design, small sample size, and predominance of male patients (74.8%). The wide confidence intervals indicate imprecision. These results are exploratory and cannot support causal conclusions.

In practice, appropriate medical management may attenuate the influence of biological sex on cardiovascular and bleeding risk in this population. However, these findings require confirmation in larger, prospective studies.

Many people with AFib also have clogged arteries. AFib is an irregular heartbeat that can raise stroke risk. Clogged arteries, known as atherosclerosis, can cause heart attacks. When both conditions exist, treatment gets more complex. A new study looked at whether women and men face different risks in this situation.

This matters because AFib is common and becomes more likely with age. It affects millions of adults. Clogged arteries are also widespread. When these two conditions overlap, the chance of stroke, heart attack, and bleeding can rise. Patients and doctors often wonder if women and men should be treated differently.

For years, doctors have known that men and women can have different heart disease patterns. Women sometimes have subtler symptoms. They may also face different bleeding risks with certain medicines. But in AFib with clogged arteries, it was unclear whether outcomes truly differ by sex.

Here is the twist. In this study, women and men had similar risks over two years. The main result combined heart related events and bleeding. It did not differ by sex. This suggests that careful, guideline based care may help balance risk for both groups.

Think of AFib as a faulty electrical rhythm in the heart. It can let blood pool and form clots. Those clots can travel to the brain and cause a stroke. Clogged arteries are like narrowed pipes. They reduce blood flow to the heart and brain. When both problems exist, the system faces two threats at once. Treatment aims to prevent clots while avoiding bleeding.

The study included 222 patients. Most were men, about 75 percent. All had a recent ischemic stroke or a transient ischemic attack, also called a mini stroke. All had AFib and clogged arteries. Patients were followed for two years. The study was a post hoc analysis, meaning the team looked at sex differences after the main trial ended.

The main result was a combined outcome. It included cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, heart attack, urgent revascularization for ischemia, systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Over two years, about 16 percent of women and 21 percent of men had an event. After adjusting for other factors, the difference was not statistically significant. In plain language, the risk looked similar between sexes.

Secondary outcomes also showed no clear sex differences. These included all ischemic cardiovascular events, ischemic stroke, all cause death, and heart attack or cardiovascular death. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant non major bleeding, and bleeding inside the skull. None differed significantly by sex.

This does not mean the study was perfect or that every patient is the same.

An expert perspective helps place these results in context. The findings suggest that appropriate medical management may reduce the influence of biological sex on risk. That means following proven guidelines for anticoagulation, blood pressure, cholesterol, and lifestyle. It also means tailoring care to the individual, not just to sex.

What this means for you. If you have AFib and clogged arteries, talk with your doctor about your overall risk. Ask about anticoagulants to prevent clots and about medicines to protect your heart and blood vessels. Women and men should both receive careful, personalized care. Do not assume your risk is higher or lower based on sex alone.

There are limitations. The study was small and included mostly men. It was a post hoc analysis, so the findings are not definitive. The two year follow up is helpful but not long enough to capture all events. Results may not apply to people with different health profiles or to those in other countries.

What happens next. Larger studies with more women are needed to confirm these results. Researchers may also look at longer follow up and different treatment strategies. For now, the best approach is to follow current guidelines and work closely with your care team. Research takes time, but steady progress helps patients make informed choices.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 222
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up24.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) frequently coexist, but whether clinical outcomes differ by sex in this population remains unclear. We evaluated sex differences in a post hoc analysis of the Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Atherothrombosis (ATIS-NVAF) trial, a randomized study of patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), NVAF, and concomitant ASCVD. METHODS: Baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared by sex. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, urgent revascularization for ischemia, or major bleeding within 2 years. Secondary outcomes were all ischemic cardiovascular events, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death. The safety outcomes were major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for women versus men. RESULTS: Of the 222 patients, most were men (74.8%). The primary outcome did not differ significantly between women and men (16.1% vs. 21.1%; aOR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.46). No significant differences were observed in secondary or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the ATIS-NVAF trial, no significant sex differences were observed in the 2-year composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events among patients with recent ischemic stroke or TIA and concomitant NVAF and ASCVD. Appropriate medical management may attenuate the influence of biological sex on the risk of cardiovascular and bleeding events.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.