Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

SGLT2 and dual SGLT1/2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization risk in type 2 diabetes patients

SGLT2 and dual SGLT1/2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization…
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider SGLT2 inhibitors for reducing cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization risk in type 2 diabetes.

This network meta-analysis compares bexagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin against placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study focuses on cardiovascular outcomes including cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, and myocardial infarction. Sample size and setting were not reported in the source data.

The analysis indicates a reduced risk for the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure with an odds ratio of 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.89). Hospitalization for heart failure alone showed a reduced risk with an odds ratio of 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.70). Acute coronary syndrome risk was also reduced with an odds ratio of 0.35 (95% CI 0.16-0.77).

Specific reductions for myocardial infarction were observed for bexagliflozin with an odds ratio of 0.39 (95% CI 0.16-0.94) and sotagliflozin with an odds ratio of 0.41 (95% CI 0.23-0.72). Safety data, adverse events, and discontinuations were not reported. The authors did not provide specific limitations or certainty notes beyond the absence of absolute numbers.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to examine the overall and comparative cardiovascular outcomes of bexagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin in type 2 diabetes patients. We included phase 3 or higher randomized controlled trials sourced from four databases: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and Embase. A random-effects model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. The secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality. Compared with placebo, bexagliflozin, ertugliflozin and sotagliflozin reduced composite cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (OR, 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.89]), hospitalization for heart failure (OR, 0.62 [0.55-0.70]) and acute coronary syndrome (OR, 0.35 [0.16-0.77]). No significant differences were observed among the three drugs for primary and secondary outcomes, although bexagliflozin (OR, 0.39 [0.16-0.94]) and sotagliflozin (OR, 0.41 [0.23-0.72]) had lower risks of myocardial infarction than did ertugliflozin. In conclusion, bexagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and sotagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. Bexagliflozin and sotagliflozin may offer additional benefits in preventing the risk of myocardial infarction.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.