Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Evaluation of Once Weekly Subcutaneous Zenagamtide for Management of Type 2 DiabetesNew weekly injection shows promise for managing Type 2 Diabetes

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Zenagamtide showed significant, dose-dependent reductions in HbA1c over 36 weeks with a tolerable safety profile.

This Phase 2, multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of zenagamtide in adults with type 2 diabetes. The study population included individuals with an HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0%, managed on stable doses of metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors. Participants were randomized to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of zenagamtide at various dosages (0.4, 1.5, 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg) or a placebo over a 36-week period.

The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 36. Results indicated that zenagamtide achieved statistically significant reductions compared to placebo across the dose range. Specifically, the 0.4 mg dose group showed an average reduction of 0.9%, with a treatment difference versus placebo of -0.77% (p=0.0021). The higher dose of 40 mg demonstrated a more pronounced effect, with a mean reduction of 1.7% and a treatment difference of -1.56% (p<0.0001).

Safety profiles were consistent with other therapies in the GLP-1 and amylin classes. Most adverse events reported by participants were gastrointestinal in nature and ranged from mild to moderate in severity. While 8% of the total cohort experienced serious adverse events, no fatalities occurred during the study period. The tolerability profile suggests that zenagamtide is well-tolerated for long-term management.

From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that zenagamtide provides a potent mechanism for glycemic control. By targeting both GLP-1 and amylin pathways, it offers a dual approach to managing postprandial glucose and improving overall metabolic outcomes in patients who are already on standard metformin therapy. The dose-dependent response observed reinforces the utility of this pharmacological class.

Limitations include the study's status as a Phase 2 trial, meaning results are based on an efficacy estimand of on-treatment data without rescue medication. However, the significant reduction in HbA1c levels at both low and high doses provides strong evidence for its potential role in clinical practice. The consistency of the safety profile across different dosages supports its viability as a viable option for patients requiring additional glycemic control. In conclusion, zenagamtide demonstrates clinically meaningful improvements in glucose management over 36 weeks. The data support its use as an effective intervention for type 2 diabetes. Clinicians may consider this agent for patients needing robust HbA1c reduction while maintaining a manageable safety profile comparable to existing GLP-1 based therapies.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence This study provides new data on a GLP-1-based and amylin-based therapy for type 2 diabetes. While previous evidence noted that SGLT2 inhibitors can raise hematocrit by 2.29% and hemoglobin by 0.51 g/dL, this trial focuses on the efficacy of zenagamtide in reducing HbA1c. The results confirm that zenagamtide provides significant glycemic improvements, complementing existing data on other glucose-lowering agents like SGLT2 inhibitors and tirzepatide.

Living with Type 2 diabetes means managing blood sugar levels every single day. For many people, this involves daily pills or frequent injections to keep their health on track. Because of the constant effort required, finding new ways to manage the condition more conveniently is a major goal for both patients and doctors. A recent study looked at a new medication called zenagamtide to see if it could offer an easier way to control blood sugar.

The researchers conducted a Phase 2 clinical trial involving 261 adults with Type 2 diabetes. These participants were already taking standard medications, like metformin. The study was large and diverse, taking place at over 80 different sites across 11 countries. Participants were given one of several doses of zenagamtide once a week, while others received a placebo (a dummy treatment with no medicine) to see how the new drug performed compared to doing nothing extra.

The results showed that zenagamtide helped lower HbA levels significantly over 36 weeks. HbA is a measure of your average blood sugar over the past few months; lowering it is a key goal in diabetes care. For those taking a low dose (0.4 mg), there was a clear drop in blood sugar compared to the placebo group. Those taking the highest dose (40 mg) saw even larger improvements, with their levels dropping by about 1.7 percent on average. These numbers suggest that the medicine is effective at helping people manage their condition.

When it comes to safety, most of the side effects reported were related to the digestive system, such as stomach issues. While these were generally mild to moderate in severity, it is important to note that 8 percent of the participants did experience serious medical events. However, no one in the study died from the treatment. The doctors noted that the way the drug was tolerated by patients was similar to other common diabetes medications currently on the market.

It is important to keep these findings in perspective. This was a Phase 2 trial, which means it is an early stage of testing used to find the right dose and check for safety. Because it was a smaller study, we cannot know exactly how it will work for everyone in the long term or how it compares to every other drug available today. It is not yet ready for widespread use.

For patients right now, this means there is a promising new option in development. While zenagamtide is not available at your local pharmacy just yet, the trial shows that it successfully lowered blood sugar levels in a way that doctors find meaningful. More testing will be needed before it can become a standard treatment.

What this means for you:
A once-weekly injection showed significant blood sugar reductions in a Phase 2 trial for Type 2 diabetes.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 225
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up8.3 mo
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Zenagamtide (formerly amycretin) is a unimolecular agonist of GLP-1, amylin, and calcitonin receptors. We aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship with respect to the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous zenagamtide compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This 36-week, randomised, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, phase 2 trial was conducted at 83 hospital and clinic sites across 11 countries. The trial consisted of a 3-week screening period, a 36-week intervention period, and a 4-week follow-up period. Adults (aged 18-75 years) with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA] 7·0-10·0% [53-86 mmol/mol]), treated with stable doses of metformin with or without a SGLT2 inhibitor, and with a BMI of 23·0 to <50·0 kg/m were randomly assigned (6:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous zenagamtide or placebo using a randomisation and trial supplies management system, before being further randomly assigned to one of six dose groups (1:1:1:1:1:1; 0·4, 1·5, 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg). Participants assigned to placebo were similarly allocated to matched placebo regimens corresponding to each dosing schedule. Randomisation was stratified by HbA (<8·5% or ≥8·5%) at screening and country of residence (Japan or other countries). The starting dose of subcutaneous zenagamtide was 0·2 mg, with dose escalations every 4 weeks until the maintenance dose was reached (0·4-40 mg). Participants and staff were masked within each dose level to placebo or zenagamtide. The primary outcome was change in HbA from baseline to week 36. The primary outcome was assessed in all randomly assigned participants using the efficacy estimand based on on-treatment data without rescue medication. Safety outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned participants exposed to treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06542874, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 7 and Dec 27, 2024, 262 (29%) of 915 screened individuals were randomly assigned to subcutaneous zenagamtide (n=225) or placebo (n=37). Participants were further randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) to one of six doses (38 participants to 0·4 mg, 36 participants to 1·5 mg, 37 participants to 5 mg, 38 participants to 10 mg, 38 participants to 20 mg, and 38 participants to 40 mg) or placebo (37 participants). 261 participants were exposed to treatment. At week 36, estimated change in HbA (mean across all groups at baseline 7·8% [SD 0·8]) ranged from -0·9% with zenagamtide 0·4 mg (estimated treatment difference vs placebo: -0·77% [95% CI -1·26 to -0·28]; p=0·0021) to -1·7% with zenagamtide 40 mg (-1·56% [-2·05 to -1·07]; p<0·0001). Most adverse events were gastrointestinal and mild to moderate in severity. 21 (8%) of 261 participants reported serious adverse events (four with zenagamtide 0·4 mg, three with 1·5 mg, two with 5 mg, five with 10 mg, three with 20 mg, one with 40 mg, and three with placebo). No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In people with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly subcutaneous zenagamtide 0·4-40 mg demonstrated clinically meaningful and significant improvements in change in HbA from baseline to week 36 compared with placebo, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with that of other GLP-1-based and amylin-based therapies. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.