Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Faecal microbiota transplantation did not significantly reduce HOMA-IR in patients with metabolic disordersFecal Microbiota Transplantation Shows Limited Benefit for Insulin Resistance

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that faecal microbiota transplantation did not demonstrate a clear benefit for glycaemic outcomes in metabolic disorders.

This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on metabolic markers in 120 adults with metabolic disorders across 6 trials. The primary outcome, HOMA-IR, showed a mean difference of -1.29 (95% CI -3.04, 0.47) but did not reach statistical significance. A sensitivity analysis including HOMA2-IR also failed to show significant results (MD, -1.11; 95% CI -2.50, 0.29).

Secondary outcomes provided limited clarity. Data for HbA1c were sparse and could not be pooled across comparator types. Results for clamp-derived peripheral insulin sensitivity suggested a possible donor-phenotype effect but remained inconclusive. The authors noted that the evidence for HOMA-IR and HbA1c is of very low certainty, while evidence for peripheral insulin sensitivity is of low certainty.

Several limitations impacted the findings, including imprecise estimates, heterogeneous results, and influence from comparator design. Because FMT did not demonstrate a clear benefit for glycaemic outcomes, its role in managing insulin resistance or glucose levels in this population remains unproven by current data.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in the management of metabolic disorders by evaluating faecal microbiota transplantation. While prior coverage established that SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs significantly reduce heart failure related composite endpoints in type 2 diabetes, and structured exercise reduces triglycerides and LDL-C, this study indicates that FMT does not provide a clear benefit for glycaemic outcomes like HOMA-IR or HbA1c.

Researchers looked at how fecal microbiota transplantation, or FMT, affects insulin resistance and blood sugar levels in adults with metabolic disorders. This review analyzed data from six different trials involving 120 participants. The goal was to see if transferring healthy gut bacteria could improve conditions like prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.

The results showed that FMT did not significantly reduce HOMA-IR, which is a common measure of insulin resistance. While some data suggested a possible link between the donor's characteristics and insulin sensitivity, the results were not conclusive. Additionally, there was very little data available regarding changes in HbA1c levels, making it hard to draw firm conclusions about long-term blood sugar control.

Because the data were sparse and the results were inconsistent across different studies, the evidence is currently considered very weak. These findings suggest that FMT does not currently show a clear benefit for managing blood sugar outcomes. Patients should speak with their healthcare provider to discuss the most effective ways to manage their specific condition.

What this means for you:
Current evidence suggests fecal microbiota transplantation does not clearly improve insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes.

Common questions

Does fecal microbiota transplantation help with insulin resistance?

The study found that fecal microbiota transplantation did not significantly reduce HOMA-IR, which is a measure of insulin resistance. Because the results were inconsistent and the evidence is considered very weak, it is not currently shown to be an effective way to improve insulin resistance for those with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes.

Can this treatment improve HbA1c levels?

The data regarding HbA1c levels were very sparse in the trials reviewed. Because there was not enough consistent information across the different studies, researchers could not determine if the treatment had a clear effect on long-term blood sugar control.

Is this a reliable treatment for type 2 diabetes?

The evidence for using this treatment for glycemic outcomes is currently very weak and inconclusive. The study did not show a clear benefit for managing blood sugar. You should talk to your doctor to find the best treatment plan for your specific health needs.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundFaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve glucose metabolism, but findings from randomised trials and previous meta-analyses are inconsistent. We evaluated the effects of FMT on glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, insulin resistance or related metabolic disorders.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Scopus for English-language randomised controlled trials published from January 2000 to May 2026. The primary outcome was change from baseline in HOMA-IR. Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, fasting glucose and clamp-derived peripheral insulin sensitivity. Random-effects meta-analyses used Paule–Mandel estimation with Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman confidence intervals. Sensitivity analyses evaluated comparator type, data reconstruction, the assumed baseline–follow-up correlation and individual-study influence. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.ResultsThe searches identified 887 records, and 18 studies met the eligibility criteria. Six trials involving 120 participants included to the primary analysis. FMT did not significantly reduce HOMA-IR compared with control (MD, −1.29; 95% CI [−3.04, 0.47]; I2 = 72%). The sensitivity analysis combining HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR also produced a non-significant result (MD, −1.11; 95% CI [−2.50, 0.29]). HbA1c data were sparse and were not pooled across comparator types. Clamp-derived findings suggested a possible donor-phenotype effect but remained inconclusive. The certainty of evidence was very low for HOMA-IR and HbA1c and low for peripheral insulin sensitivity.ConclusionsFMT did not demonstrate a clear benefit for glycaemic outcomes. The estimates were imprecise, heterogeneous and influenced by comparator design. Larger trials with standardised outcomes and predefined donor phenotypes are required.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.