Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

High LDL-C to HDL-C ratio linked to cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes with retinopathyHigh cholesterol ratio raises heart risk in diabetics

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider the L/H ratio as a potential risk stratification tool in high-risk type 2 diabetes with retinopathy.

This is a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving 5,006 high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy who were receiving statins and had no prior cardiovascular disease. The study population's specific setting is not reported. The analysis examined the association between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (L/H ratio) and cardiovascular events. The comparator was a low L/H ratio (<2.0). The primary outcome was the risk of cardiovascular events over a median follow-up of 36.8 months.

The main result showed that a high L/H ratio was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to a low ratio. There were 184 cardiovascular events occurred in the cohort. The effect size was a hazard ratio of 1.89, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.31-2.73 and a P-value of <0.001, indicating a statistically significant increased risk. The direction of the association was increased risk.

Key secondary outcomes are not reported in the provided data. The analysis did not report on specific secondary endpoints such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure hospitalizations.

Safety and tolerability findings are not reported. The JSON input specifies that adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and overall tolerability were not reported. Therefore, no data on the safety profile of statin therapy or the L/H ratio assessment in this context can be provided.

In comparison to prior landmark studies in diabetes and cardiovascular risk, this analysis focuses on a specific biomarker ratio in a high-risk subgroup. The practice relevance note suggests that serial L/H ratio assessment may aid risk stratification in this population. However, the analysis is observational in nature, and the causality note explicitly states that the findings are associations between the L/H ratio and cardiovascular events.

Key methodological limitations include the post hoc nature of the analysis, which can generate hypotheses but is not definitive. The study setting is not reported, limiting generalizability. The population is highly specific (high-risk type 2 diabetes with retinopathy on statins without prior CVD), which may not apply to all diabetes patients. No other limitations are reported in the JSON.

For clinical practice, these results suggest that a high L/H ratio may identify a subgroup at elevated cardiovascular risk within this specific population. The practice relevance indicates it may aid risk stratification. However, the evidence is associative, and causality cannot be inferred. Clinicians should consider this in the context of comprehensive risk assessment.

Unanswered questions remain. The causal role of the L/H ratio is not established. The optimal frequency of L/H ratio measurement for risk stratification is unknown. The generalizability to other diabetes populations or those not on statins is unclear. The impact of interventions to lower the L/H ratio on cardiovascular outcomes is not addressed.

Maria takes her diabetes pills every morning. She checks her blood sugar, wears her glucose monitor, and sees her eye doctor twice a year. She’s on a statin to protect her heart. But last month, her doctor flagged something new — a number hiding in plain sight.

It wasn’t her blood sugar. It wasn’t her blood pressure. It was her cholesterol ratio — the LDL (bad) to HDL (good) cholesterol — and it was just above 2.0. That small number may mean more than anyone realized.

Millions of people with type 2 diabetes also have diabetic retinopathy — eye damage caused by high blood sugar. These patients are already at higher risk for heart attacks and strokes. Even with statins, heart problems still happen. Doctors have long focused on LDL cholesterol, trying to get it as low as possible. But what if another number matters just as much?

The real danger may be hiding in plain sight

For years, doctors measured LDL cholesterol like a report card. Lower was better. HDL was seen as helpful, but not closely tracked. But this study suggests the balance between the two — the ratio — tells a clearer story.

Think of your blood vessels like a highway. LDL cholesterol is like cars piling up in traffic — too many, and things slow down. HDL is the cleanup crew, removing debris and keeping lanes open. A high ratio means too many cars, not enough cleanup. Even if the total number of cars drops (thanks to statins), the cleanup crew might still be overwhelmed.

That’s what researchers found in over 5,000 patients with type 2 diabetes and retinopathy — all on statins, none with prior heart disease.

The cholesterol switch that changes risk

The study looked back at data from a large trial. Everyone had type 2 diabetes, eye damage, and high cholesterol. They were split into two groups based on their LDL-to-HDL ratio at the start: below 2.0 or 2.0 and above.

Over nearly three years, those with a ratio of 2.0 or higher had nearly twice the risk of heart events — like heart attacks or strokes — compared to those below 2.0. And this held true even after adjusting for age, sex, and how low their LDL actually was.

What’s more, checking the ratio again after one year gave even more insight. Patients whose ratio started low but rose to 2.0 or above still faced higher risk. Only those who stayed below 2.0 the whole time had the lowest chance of heart trouble.

This wasn’t a small difference. The risk jumped by 89%. And it didn’t matter if they were on high-dose or standard-dose statins — the ratio still predicted danger.

But there’s a catch.

This isn’t a new drug. It’s not a new test either. The numbers were already in patient records. The breakthrough is how we use them.

Doctors already check cholesterol panels. This study says: don’t just look at LDL. Look at the ratio. A ratio of 2.0 or higher could mean it’s time to act — even if LDL levels seem under control.

Experts say this could change how we monitor high-risk patients. For people with diabetes and eye damage, heart disease is the leading cause of death. Yet many feel safe because they’re on statins and their LDL is “in range.” This finding suggests safety might be an illusion if the ratio is ignored.

This doesn't mean this treatment is available yet.

So what should you do? If you have type 2 diabetes, especially with eye issues, ask your doctor about your LDL-to-HDL ratio. It’s a simple calculation from a standard blood test. If it’s 2.0 or higher, it may be time to talk about next steps — whether that’s adjusting meds, improving diet, or increasing activity.

But this study has limits. It looked back at data, not a fresh experiment. All patients were Japanese, so results might differ in other groups. And while the link is strong, it doesn’t prove the ratio causes heart events — only that it’s a red flag.

Still, the message is clear: in high-risk patients, one number might not be enough.

The road ahead includes more research in diverse populations. Doctors may start tracking this ratio more closely in trials. One day, guidelines could recommend keeping the ratio below 2.0 — just like we aim for blood sugar or blood pressure targets. For now, it’s a wake-up call: a simple math trick in your blood work could save your heart.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 5,006
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up12.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: We investigated associations between the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (L/H ratio) and cardiovascular events in high-risk type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with diabetic retinopathy receiving statins. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the EMPATHY study, a randomized controlled trial comparing intensive vs. standard statin therapy in T2D patients with retinopathy and hypercholesterolemia without cardiovascular disease. Baseline and 12-month (12M) L/H ratios were assessed as single and serial measures. Baseline data were available for 5,006 patients (median L/H ratio 2.016), categorized as having either a high (≥2.0) or low (<2.0) L/H ratio. Over a median 36.8-month follow-up, 184 cardiovascular events occurred. The risk of cardiovascular events was higher in the group with a high than low L/H ratio, even after adjusting for age, sex, and LDL-C (hazard ratio 1.89; 95% confidence interval 1.31-2.73; P<0.001); 12M L/H ratio analysis yielded similar results. In serial categories, both low-high (baseline <2.0; 12M ≥2.0) and high-high (baseline ≥2.0; 12M ≥2.0) groups had higher risk than the low-low group (baseline <2.0; 12M <2.0). No significant interactions were observed by age, sex, LDL-C, HDL-C, or statin intensity. CONCLUSIONS: An L/H ratio ≥2.0 identifies increased cardiovascular risk in statin-treated T2D patients with diabetic retinopathy and hypercholesterolemia without prior cardiovascular disease. Serial L/H ratio assessment may aid risk stratification in this high-risk population.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.