Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

6-month bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and levofloxacin or clofazimine regimen is noninferior to 9-month standard careTrial shows shorter treatment works for resistant tuberculosis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that a 6-month bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and levofloxacin or clofazimine regimen is noninferior to 9-month care.

This Phase 3 randomized controlled noninferiority trial enrolled 403 participants aged 6 years or older with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa. The study included individuals who were pregnant, breastfeeding, or had fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.

The intervention group received a 6-month treatment strategy consisting of bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and levofloxacin or clofazimine or both. This was compared against the current 9-month standard-of-care treatment regimen in South Africa.

At the end of treatment and at 76 weeks, the success rate (cure or completion) was 86.1% in the trial-strategy group versus 86.0% in the control group. The difference was -0.2 percentage points (95% CI [-6.9, 6.5]; P=0.001 for noninferiority). Regarding safety, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 31.2% of the trial-strategy group and 37.0% of the control group. There were 10 deaths in each group.

The study concludes that the 6-month trial strategy is noninferior to the standard-of-care for successful outcomes. While the safety profiles were similar, the shorter regimen may offer a practical alternative for managing pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in treatment duration for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis by establishing that a 6-month regimen is noninferior to the standard 9-month course. It complements other findings regarding tuberculosis management, such as the use of video observed therapy to improve success and adherence, and the observation that immediate antituberculosis therapy did not reduce mortality in HIV-related sepsis overall.

Researchers conducted a large trial in South Africa involving 403 people with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. The study compared a shorter, six-month treatment using bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and either levofloxacin or clofazimine against the standard nine-month care currently used in the region.

The results showed that 86.1% of patients in the shorter treatment group had a successful outcome compared to 86.0% in the longer treatment group. The study confirmed that the six-month strategy was not inferior to the standard nine-month regimen for curing the infection or completing treatment.

Regarding safety, both groups reported similar levels of tolerability. While there were some serious side effects, the shorter treatment actually had a lower rate of high-grade adverse events (31.2%) compared to the standard care (37.0%). Both groups experienced 10 deaths during the study period. This trial suggests that a shorter course may be an effective alternative for patients with this specific type of tuberculosis.

What this means for you:
A six-month treatment plan showed similar success rates and safety to the standard nine-month course.

Common questions

Is the shorter treatment as effective as the long one?

Yes, the study showed that the 6-month treatment was not inferior to the 9-month standard of care. Specifically, 86.1% of patients in the 6-month group had a successful outcome compared to 86.0% in the 9-month group.

Are there safety concerns with the shorter treatment?

The safety profiles were similar between both groups. The 6-month treatment actually reported fewer high-grade adverse events (31.2%) than the standard care (37.0%). Both groups had 10 deaths during the study period.

Who was included in this tuberculosis study?

The study included 403 people aged 6 and older with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa. This included patients who were pregnant, breastfeeding, or had fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 202
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Safer, more effective treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis are needed. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, open-label, pragmatic, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial in South Africa to assess a 6-month treatment strategy for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Participants with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis who were 6 years of age or older were randomly assigned to a regimen consisting of bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and levofloxacin or clofazimine or both for 6 months (trial-strategy group) or the 9-month standard-of-care treatment regimen that was current in South Africa (control group). Persons who were pregnant or breastfeeding and those who had fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis were included in the trial population. Treatment in both groups was adjusted on the basis of results of second-line drug susceptibility testing. The primary efficacy end point was a successful outcome (cure or completion of treatment) at the end of treatment and at 76 weeks after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 10 percentage points. The primary safety end point was an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. RESULTS: Among the 432 persons who were screened, 403 underwent randomization; 203 were assigned to the trial-strategy group, and 200 to the control group. A successful outcome was observed in 174 of 202 participants (86.1%) in the trial-strategy group and in 172 of 200 (86.0%) in the control group. The adjusted risk difference was -0.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.9 to 6.5; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred during treatment in 63 of 202 participants (31.2%) in the trial-strategy group and in 74 of 200 (37.0%) in the control group; 10 participants in each group died. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants in South Africa with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, the 6-month trial strategy was noninferior to the standard-of-care strategy with respect to a successful outcome. The safety profiles of the two strategies were similar. (Funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development and others; BEAT Tuberculosis ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04062201.).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.