Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Tenecteplase Combined With Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcomes in Low ASPECTS Stroke PatientsTenecteplase Plus Thrombectomy May Help Specific Stroke Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Tenecteplase plus thrombectomy shows a signal of benefit for functional independence in patients with ASPECTS <8.

This post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of intravenous tenecteplase combined with mechanical thrombectomy in 550 patients with acute large-vessel occlusion stroke. The study specifically examined outcomes based on Alberta Stroke Prognosis Score (ASPECTS) to determine if pre-treatment with tenecteplase offered specific benefits for patients with more extensive early ischemic damage.

In the subgroup of patients with an ASPECTS score below 8, those receiving both tenecteplice and thrombectomy demonstrated significantly higher rates of functional independence at 90 days compared to those receiving thrombectomy alone. The adjusted relative risk was 1.67 (95% CI 1.18-2.35), suggesting a potential clinical benefit for this specific high-risk population.

Conversely, patients with an ASPECTS score of 8 to 10 showed no significant difference in functional outcomes between the two treatment groups. Additionally, while symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were comparable across both cohorts, mortality was numerically higher in the combined therapy group among those with higher ASPECT scores. Due to the exploratory nature of this post hoc analysis, prospective trials are necessary to confirm these findings before clinical practice changes.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in identifying specific patient subgroups that may benefit from combined tenecteplase and thrombectomy. While previous coverage noted that mechanical thrombectomy shows potential for favorable outcomes in pediatric large-vessel occlusion stroke, this study provides data on adult patients with varying ASPECTS scores. It does not relate to the findings regarding idarucizumab-mediated reversal of dabigatran or genetic risk scores for Primary Aldosteronism.

This study looked at 550 patients who experienced a large-vessel occlusion stroke within 4.5 hours of their last known well state. Researchers compared two treatments: giving tenecteplase along with a thrombectomy versus performing a thrombectomy alone. The goal was to see which method led to better functional independence after 90 days.

The results showed a significant difference based on the extent of brain damage, measured by an ASPECTS score. For patients with more severe damage (ASPECTS less than 8), those who received both tenecteplase and thrombectomy had significantly higher rates of functional independence. However, for patients with less severe damage (ASPECTS 8 to 10), there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups.

Safety data showed no significant difference in bleeding risks between the groups. However, mortality rates were numerically higher in the group receiving both treatments among those with less severe brain damage. Because this was an exploratory post hoc analysis, the findings are not yet enough to change standard medical practice. Doctors will need more prospective trials to confirm these results before making changes to how stroke patients are treated.

What this means for you:
Tenecteplase plus thrombectomy may help some severe stroke cases, but more research is needed for others.

Common questions

Who specifically might benefit from adding tenecteplase?

The study suggests that patients with more severe brain damage, specifically those with an ASPECTS score of less than 8, showed significantly higher rates of functional independence when receiving both tenecteplase and thrombectomy. This finding is based on a post hoc analysis of 550 patients.

Is it safe to use tenecteplase with thrombectomy?

The study found no significant difference in the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two treatment groups. However, because this was an exploratory analysis, more research is needed to confirm these safety findings before changing standard care.

How do results differ for patients with less severe brain damage?

For patients with an ASPECTS score of 8 to 10, there was no significant difference in functional independence between the two groups. In this specific group, mortality was numerically higher in the group that received both tenecteplase and thrombectomy.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 550
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of ischemic extent on the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the baseline ischemic extent, measured by the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), modifies outcomes of intravenous tenecteplase administered before endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the BRIDGE-TNK (thrombectomy with vs without rhTNK-tPA in stroke) trial, conducted across China from May 2022 to September 2024. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone in acute large-vessel occlusion stroke patients within 4.5 hours of last known well, stratified by baseline ASPECTS (<8 vs 8-10). The outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), 48-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Regression models incorporating a treatment-by-ASPECTS interaction term were used for analysis. RESULTS: Among 550 patients, 241 (43.8%) had ASPECTS <8 (median [interquartile range, IQR] age, 69 [61-77] years; 56.4% male) and 309 had ASPECTS 8-10 (median [IQR] age, 70 [61-77] years; 59.5% male). The rate of functional independence was significantly higher in the tenecteplase plus thrombectomy group than in the thrombectomy-alone group in the ASPECTS <8 subgroup (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.67; 95% CI 1.18-2.35), but not in the ASPECTS 8-10 subgroup (aRR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.84-1.17; = 0.007). Rates of sICH did not differ significantly between treatment groups in either ASPECTS subgroups (ASPECTS <8: 10.0% vs 11.2%; ASPECTS 8-10: 7.5% vs 2.8%; = 0.11). Ninety-day mortality was comparable between treatment groups in the ASPECTS <8 subgroup, but numerically higher with tenecteplase plus thrombectomy in the ASPECTS 8-10 subgroup (aRR = 1.89, 95% CI 0.99-3.61, = 0.04). DISCUSSION: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, a signal of benefit was observed in patients with ASPECTS <8 who received intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy, whereas no functional improvement and possible safety concerns were seen in those with ASPECTS 8-10. Prospective confirmation in randomized trials is required before practice change. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04733742.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.