Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

eSMARTER digital platform meets non-inferiority goals for Alzheimer's genetic and biomarker result disclosureDigital Platforms Match Clinician Support for Alzheimer's Genetic Results

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that the eSMARTER digital platform is non-inferior to clinician-mediated sessions for disclosing AD results.

This randomized non-inferiority trial enrolled 651 English-speaking adults aged 60 to 80 who underwent APOE genotyping and psychological screening. The study was conducted in a decentralized, fully remote setting in the contiguous United States. Participants were randomized to either the eSMARTER digital platform or clinician-mediated telehealth sessions for the disclosure of APOE genotype and optional pTau-217 results.

Primary outcomes included changes in anxiety, disease-specific distress, and AD-related knowledge at 1 to 7 days following disclosure. The study met non-inferiority for these primary outcomes. Regarding secondary outcomes, no significant between group differences were found following the disclosure of pTau-217 results. Of the 651 randomized participants, 604 completed the study and 500 completed the optional pTau-217 disclosure.

No data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, or discontinuations were reported. While the study suggests the digital platform is comparable to clinician-mediated disclosure, it does not establish superiority. The platform may provide a scalable approach for returning Alzheimer's disease genetic and biomarker results in clinical practice.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in the delivery of results for biomarkers like pTau-217. While prior evidence noted that the p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio nearly doubles the diagnostic odds ratio for amyloid pathology in Alzheimer's disease, this trial focuses on the method of communicating those results to patients. The finding that digital platforms meet non-inferiority goals for disclosure provides a potential scalable framework for managing the results of the biomarkers discussed in previous coverage.

Researchers conducted a trial to see how patients react when learning about their Alzheimer's disease genetic markers. The study included over 600 adults aged 60 to 80. Participants were split into two groups: one received results through a digital platform, and the other received them during a telehealth session with a clinician.

The results showed that the digital platform was not inferior to clinician-led sessions. Patients who used the digital platform reported similar levels of anxiety and distress. They also showed similar levels of knowledge regarding Alzheimer's disease compared to those who spoke with a clinician.

This finding suggests that digital tools can be a practical way to share sensitive genetic information. While the study shows the digital method is comparable to clinician-mediated care, it does not mean it is better. It simply means it is a reliable alternative for providing results to many people at once.

What this means for you:
Digital platforms are comparable to clinician-led sessions for sharing Alzheimer's genetic results and biomarkers.

Common questions

Is a digital platform safe for receiving Alzheimer's results?

The study found that the digital platform was not inferior to clinician-mediated sessions. Patients using the digital platform reported similar levels of anxiety and distress as those who spoke with a clinician. No specific safety concerns or adverse events were reported in the study data.

Does a digital platform provide enough information about Alzheimer's?

Yes, the study showed that patients who used the digital platform had similar levels of Alzheimer's-related knowledge compared to those who received information from a clinician. The results suggest the digital platform is a comparable way to share these results.

How did patients feel after learning their results online?

Patients who received their results through the digital platform showed no significant differences in distress or anxiety compared to those who spoke with a clinician. The study suggests the digital platform is a scalable way to deliver these results.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 216
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Importance: Patients are increasingly learning Alzheimers disease (AD) genetic and biomarker results through electronic health portals. Evaluation of alternative scalable delivery models for return of AD risk information is needed to best support patient understanding and psychological well-being. Objective: To determine whether a patient-centered digital platform is comparable to clinician-mediated telehealth sessions for returning APOE and plasma pTau-217 results on outcomes of knowledge and psychological well-being. Design: The Evaluation of Self-Mediated Alternatives for Risk Testing Education and Return of Results (eSMARTER) study was a noninferiority trial of a patient-centered digital platform compared to clinician-mediated disclosure of APOE genotype and optional pTau-217 disclosure. Setting: Decentralized, fully remote trial enrolled participants in the contiguous United States (U.S.) between October 2024 and February 2025, with follow-up completed in November 2025. Participants: Eligible participants were aged 60-80 and had previously undergone APOE genotyping (without disclosure) via the GeneMatch program, passed psychological screening, had internet access, and were English-speaking. Interventions: Participants were randomized, 2:1, to the eSMARTER digital platform or clinician-mediated disclosure of APOE genotype. Following the 6-month post-APOE assessment, participants were offered optional pTau-217 disclosure via the same randomized modality. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes at 1-7 days following APOE disclosure included changes in anxiety, disease-specific distress, and AD-related knowledge within a priori non-inferiority margins. Results: 674 persons (mean [SD] age 68 [4.7] years; 451 [67%] female; mean [SD] telephone MoCA=19 [2]) were eligible and provided demographic information. 651 participants were randomized to clinician-mediated (n=216) or digital disclosure (n=435) and completed APOE disclosure (66 [10%] APOE4 homozygotes, 377 [58%] heterozygotes, 208 [32%] non-carriers). 604 participants completed the study; 500 completed optional pTau-217 disclosure. Baseline characteristics were balanced across groups. At 1-7 days following APOE disclosure, scores on AD-related knowledge, PROMIS Anxiety, and disease-specific distress measures met non-inferiority. Conclusions and Relevance: Disclosure of APOE genotype by the eSMARTER digital platform is non-inferior to clinician-mediated telehealth disclosure. No significant between group differences were found following disclosure of pTau-217 results. Together, these results suggest that this digital platform may provide an evidence-based scalable approach for returning AD genetic and biomarker results.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.