Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Excitatory rTMS provides small to moderate MMSE improvements in mild to moderate Alzheimer's DiseaserTMS Shows Small to Moderate Gains for Alzheimer's Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that excitatory rTMS provides modest, stable improvements in MMSE scores for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols, including high-frequency rTMS and iTBS, compared to sham stimulation in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease. The analysis of 143 patients showed a small-to-moderate improvement in MMSE scores (effect size 0.41; 95% CI [0.06, 0.75], p = 0.021). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results, with an effect size of 0.46 when excluding studies with methodological concerns and 0.48 when including change scores.

A time-trend analysis indicated a stable overall effect (0.38), though follow-up analysis showed only a nonsignificant trend toward sustained benefits (0.25). The authors noted that treatment duration may influence outcomes, with a correlation between duration and efficacy (beta = -0.193, p = 0.034).

The authors highlight several limitations, including a small number of included studies (k < 10) and the need for larger, standardized, multi-center trials with long-term follow-up. Clinical evidence suggests that excitatory protocols targeting the left DLPFC provide the most consistent results. Currently, rTMS offers modest cognitive benefits for this population, but the evidence base remains limited.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in non-pharmacological interventions for Alzheimer's Disease. While previous evidence has focused on risk factors such as organochlorine pesticide exposure (2.19 odds ratio) and diagnostic biomarkers like the p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio, this study provides data on the efficacy of excitatory rTMS. It confirms that rTMS provides modest cognitive benefits, though the evidence is currently limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up periods.

Researchers analyzed data from several clinical trials involving patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. They looked at the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain. The study focused on excitatory protocols, which are designed to stimulate the brain's cognitive networks.

The analysis found that these treatments led to small to moderate improvements in memory and thinking scores. While the results were consistent across different types of analysis, the benefits were described as modest. The study also noted that the length of the treatment might influence how well the therapy works for the patient.

Because this was a review of a small number of studies, the evidence is currently limited. The researchers noted that more large, standardized, and multi-center trials are needed to understand the long-term effects of this treatment. Patients should view these findings as an early indication of potential benefits rather than a confirmed cure.

What this means for you:
rTMS shows modest cognitive improvements for mild to moderate Alzheimer's, but more large-scale research is needed.

Common questions

What is rTMS and how does it help with Alzheimer's?

rTMS stands for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. It uses magnetic pulses to stimulate the brain. In this study, specific excitatory protocols were used to target areas involved in memory and thinking. The results showed small to moderate improvements in cognitive scores for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

How much improvement did patients see?

The study found a small to moderate improvement in MMSE scores, which are used to measure cognitive function. While the results were consistent across different types of analysis, the researchers noted that the benefits are modest and the evidence is still limited due to the small number of studies reviewed.

Is this treatment safe for Alzheimer's patients?

The specific data provided in this study did not report any adverse events or safety concerns. However, because the evidence is still limited and the study was small, you should talk to a doctor to discuss the safety and suitability of rTMS for your specific situation.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has shown potential for improving cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD), though findings remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and durability of rTMS in patients with mild to moderate AD and explored potential moderating factors. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing active rTMS with sham stimulation were identified through systematic searches of major databases. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g, with random-effects models applied. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Five RCTs (N = 143) were included in the primary analysis. rTMS showed a small-to-moderate improvement in MMSE scores (g = 0.41, 95% CI [0.06, 0.75], p = 0.021, I = 6.5%). Excluding two studies with methodological concerns yielded a similar effect (g = 0.46), though with wider confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis including studies with change scores confirmed the robustness of results (g = 0.48). Given the limited number of studies (k < 10), formal publication bias tests and trim-and-fill adjustment were not applied, in line with current methodological guidance. Notably, all five studies employed excitatory stimulation protocols (high-frequency rTMS or iTBS), with four of five targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), suggesting that excitatory stimulation of key cognitive network hubs represents the most consistent evidence base to date. Meta-regression identified treatment duration as a significant moderator (β = -0.193, p = 0.034), suggesting shorter, more intensive protocols may be more effective. Follow-up analyses indicated a nonsignificant trend towards sustained benefits (g = 0.25), while time-trend analysis demonstrated a stable overall effect (g = 0.38). In conclusion, rTMS provides modest cognitive benefits in mild to moderate AD, with excitatory protocols targeting the left DLPFC showing the most consistent efficacy and treatment duration influencing outcomes. However, evidence remains limited, highlighting the need for larger, standardised, multi-centre trials with long-term follow-up.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.