Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Lumbosacral orthoses may improve pain and disability in some patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Lumbosacral orthoses may improve pain and disability in some patients with chronic non-specific…
Photo by julien Tromeur / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider lumbosacral orthoses as part of multimodal rehabilitation for select patients with chronic low back pain.

This systematic review synthesized evidence from 11 RCTs involving 691 participants to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of lumbosacral orthoses for chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP). The scope included various designs, including rigid, semi-rigid, soft, extensible, and inextensible models.

The review found that improvements in pain or disability were reported in some studies, particularly during short-term intervention periods. However, the authors noted that findings were not consistent across all trials. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity among the included studies, a meta-analysis was not possible.

Several limitations were identified, including limited objective neuromuscular outcomes and psychosocial measures. Additionally, there was inconsistent assessment of patient tolerance, adherence, and adverse effects. While orthosis-induced muscle atrophy was not reported as an adverse event, other safety metrics were not consistently assessed across the literature.

Clinically, lumbosacral orthoses may be helpful for selected individuals with CLBP when integrated into a multimodal rehabilitation program. Practitioners should note that evidence is inconsistent and results are most evident in short-term applications.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionChronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) is a common and disabling condition. Lumbosacral orthoses are used in conservative care, but their clinical benefit remains unclear. This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of lumbosacral orthoses in adults with CLBP.MethodsA search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, PEDro, and Web of Science up to July 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating lumbar or lumbosacral orthoses in adults with CLBP were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the level of evidence was classified descriptively using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework. The review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.ResultsEleven RCTs involving 691 participants were included. The studies used different types of lumbosacral orthoses, including rigid, semi-rigid, soft, extensible, and inextensible designs. Intervention duration ranged from a single session to 12 months. Several studies reported improvements in pain or disability after lumbosacral orthosis use, especially in short-term intervention periods. The findings were not consistent across studies, and meta-analysis was not possible because of methodological heterogeneity. No study reported orthosis-induced muscle atrophy, but adverse effects, adherence, and patient tolerance were not consistently assessed. Objective neuromuscular outcomes and psychosocial measures were also limited.DiscussionCurrent evidence suggests that lumbosacral orthoses may be helpful for selected individuals with CLBP, especially when used as part of multimodal rehabilitation. Further high-quality RCTs with standardized protocols and longer follow-up are needed.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.