Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Peer-delivered PMP-I significantly reduces stress and anxiety in Bhutanese refugees with Cohen's d > 0.8Peer support program reduces stress and anxiety for Bhutanese immigrants

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider peer-delivered PMP-I as a potentially effective intervention for reducing stress and anxiety in refugee populations.

This pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 232 Bhutanese adults (116 families) in Massachusetts with PHQ-9 scores of 14 or less. Participants were assigned to either a peer-delivered Problem Management Plus for Immigrants (PMP-I) program, consisting of five sessions including psychoeducation and behavioral activation, or a talk program with a community support services pamphlet.

At both 6-week and 3-month follow-ups, the PMP-I group showed significantly greater decreases in stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes including coping, family conflict resolution, self-efficacy, family satisfaction, and social networking were significantly higher in the intervention group at both time points (Cohen's d > 0.8, p <.01). No significant differences were observed in hair cortisol concentrations between groups.

Safety data regarding adverse events or discontinuations were not reported. Limitations include the pilot study design, a small sample size of 116 families, and limited diversity in the participant population. While results suggest potential public health benefits for Bhutanese refugees, larger-scale RCTs with diverse refugee groups are required to confirm these findings.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in mental health interventions for specific immigrant populations. While previous coverage highlighted family-centered care improving well-being in NICU parents and multi-component interventions reducing stigma in nursing students, this study specifically evaluates the efficacy of peer-delivered, culturally tailored programs (PMP-I) for refugees. It provides evidence for a non-clinical, community-based approach to mental health support.

Moving to a new country brings immense pressure. For Bhutanese refugees in Massachusetts, navigating a new culture while managing mental health can be overwhelming. A recent pilot study looked at how a peer-delivered program called Problem Management Plus for Immigrants (PMP-I) could help these families cope with the transition.

The study followed 116 families over three months. One group received the PMP-I program, which included five sessions on problem-solving, social support, and mind-body exercises. The other group received a simple pamphlet about community services. Those in the peer-led group saw much larger drops in stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms at both the six-week and three-month marks.

Beyond just feeling less stressed, those in the peer program reported better ways to cope with problems and higher levels of family satisfaction. While the study was small and focused specifically on Bhutanese adults, it suggests that peer-led support can be a powerful tool for immigrant mental health. However, because this was a pilot study, more research with larger, diverse groups is needed to see if these results apply to all refugee communities.

What this means for you:
Peer-led programs can significantly lower stress and improve family life for immigrants facing new challenges.

Common questions

What did the peer-led program actually involve?

The program was called Problem Management Plus for Immigrants. It consisted of five sessions that included psychoeducation, problem-solving, behavioral activation, social support and networking, and mind-body exercises.

How did the participants' symptoms change?

Participants in the peer-led group showed a significantly greater decrease in stress, anxiety, and depressive symptom scores compared to those who only received a pamphlet. These improvements were noted at both the 6-week and 3-month marks.

Did the program help with family life?

Yes. Participants in the peer-led group reported significantly higher scores in coping, family conflict resolution, self-efficacy, family satisfaction, and social networking compared to the control group at both 6-week and 3-month periods.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 232
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up1.4 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIMS: Refugees bear the highest burden of mental health issues; however, they often underuse available mental health services. Interventions aimed at those with diagnosed conditions frequently do little to prevent the onset of disorders. Problem Management Plus for Immigrants (PMP-I) is a prevention intervention adapted from the World Health Organization's Problem Management Plus (PMP). PMP-I includes psychoeducation, problem-solving, behavioural activation, social support and networking, and mind-body exercises. This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of PMP-I on mental, social and emotional well-being outcomes among Bhutanese refugees resettled in Massachusetts. METHODS: Bhutanese individuals aged 18 or older who had resettled in Massachusetts and scored ≤14 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were randomly assigned to two groups: PMP-I ( = 58 families) and a talk programme with a community support services pamphlet ( = 58 families). Trained community interventionists delivered five sessions of PMP-I to intervention participants in their family settings. Primary outcomes included scores on measures of stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale-10), and anxiety and depression (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25), assessed at baseline, 6-week and 3-month post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included hair cortisol, coping, coping self-efficacy, social support, social network, family conflict resolution and family satisfaction. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse differences in changes in outcomes between the intervention and control groups, adjusting for baseline scores on the primary outcomes, as well as age, duration of residence, marital status and history of chronic diseases. RESULTS: All 232 participants recruited (116 families) were retained throughout the project. The intervention group evidenced a significantly greater decrease than the control group at both 6-week and 3-month post-intervention assessments on the primary outcomes of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptom scores. Similarly, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores at both the 6-week and 3-month periods after the intervention compared to the control group on measures of coping, family conflict resolution, self-efficacy, family satisfaction and social networking with large effect sizes (Cohen's  > 0.8,  < .01). Hair cortisol concentrations did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups at either baseline or 3-month post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The PMP-I improved the mental, social and emotional well-being of Bhutanese adults (PHQ-9 score ≤ 14) resettled in Massachusetts. Peer-delivered, family-centred PMP-I offers a significant public health benefit; however, a large-scale, RCT involving diverse refugee groups is necessary to replicate its success nationwide and beyond.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.