Plasma NfL levels elevated in bipolar and depressive disorders in UK Biobank cohort
This cohort study analyzed data from 47,495 UK Biobank participants (54.0% female; 93.5% White; mean age 56.8 years) to assess deviations in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels from normative predictions across psychiatric diagnoses, including bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, depressive episodes, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, stress-related disorders, and other psychiatric disorders. The reference population was based on normative predictions, with outcomes including plasma NfL and GFAP levels, their variability, and thresholds exceeding normative percentiles.
Main results showed plasma NfL levels were higher than the reference population in bipolar disorder (effect size d=0.20, 95% CI 0.03-0.37, p=0.03), recurrent depressive disorder (d=0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.38, p=0.009), and depressive episodes (d=0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.10, p=0.01), but lower in anxiety disorders (d=-0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.02, p=0.008). Plasma NfL levels did not differ in schizophrenia spectrum, stress-related, or other psychiatric disorders. Plasma GFAP levels were not elevated in any psychiatric disorders. Variability in NfL levels was greater than reference in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (VR=1.30, p=0.005), depressive episodes (VR=1.06, p=0.006), and anxiety disorders (VR=1.08, p=0.005), while variability in GFAP levels increased in anxiety disorders (VR=1.08, p=0.01). Plasma NfL levels exceeding percentile-based normative thresholds were more common in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, and depressive episodes.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include that neurological diagnoses, cardiometabolic burden, and substance use were associated with plasma NfL and GFAP levels, though these confounding factors were accounted for in the analysis. The study design is observational, indicating association only, and population-level evidence from a large-scale normative modeling study provides moderate certainty. Practice relevance supports the potential of plasma NfL as a biomarker in psychiatry and informs ongoing neurological applications, highlighting the need to consider psychiatric comorbidity in such contexts.