Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Plasma NfL levels elevated in bipolar and depressive disorders in UK Biobank cohort

Plasma NfL levels elevated in bipolar and depressive disorders in UK Biobank cohort
Photo by Tati Visual / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider plasma NfL as a potential biomarker in bipolar and depressive disorders, but interpret cautiously due to observational design.

This cohort study analyzed data from 47,495 UK Biobank participants (54.0% female; 93.5% White; mean age 56.8 years) to assess deviations in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels from normative predictions across psychiatric diagnoses, including bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, depressive episodes, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, stress-related disorders, and other psychiatric disorders. The reference population was based on normative predictions, with outcomes including plasma NfL and GFAP levels, their variability, and thresholds exceeding normative percentiles.

Main results showed plasma NfL levels were higher than the reference population in bipolar disorder (effect size d=0.20, 95% CI 0.03-0.37, p=0.03), recurrent depressive disorder (d=0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.38, p=0.009), and depressive episodes (d=0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.10, p=0.01), but lower in anxiety disorders (d=-0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.02, p=0.008). Plasma NfL levels did not differ in schizophrenia spectrum, stress-related, or other psychiatric disorders. Plasma GFAP levels were not elevated in any psychiatric disorders. Variability in NfL levels was greater than reference in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (VR=1.30, p=0.005), depressive episodes (VR=1.06, p=0.006), and anxiety disorders (VR=1.08, p=0.005), while variability in GFAP levels increased in anxiety disorders (VR=1.08, p=0.01). Plasma NfL levels exceeding percentile-based normative thresholds were more common in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, and depressive episodes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include that neurological diagnoses, cardiometabolic burden, and substance use were associated with plasma NfL and GFAP levels, though these confounding factors were accounted for in the analysis. The study design is observational, indicating association only, and population-level evidence from a large-scale normative modeling study provides moderate certainty. Practice relevance supports the potential of plasma NfL as a biomarker in psychiatry and informs ongoing neurological applications, highlighting the need to consider psychiatric comorbidity in such contexts.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
Sample sizen = 47,495
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ImportanceBlood neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are entering clinical use in neurology as markers of neuroaxonal and astrocytic injury, but their utility in psychiatry is unclear. ObjectiveTo determine whether psychiatric diagnoses are associated with altered plasma NfL and GFAP levels. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based study examined plasma NfL and GFAP among 47,495 participants from the UK Biobank (54.0% female; 93.5% White; mean [SD] age 56.8 [8.2] years) who provided blood samples and sociodemographic and clinical data between 2006 and 2010. Normative modeling was applied to assess associations between 7 lifetime psychiatric diagnostic categories and deviations from expected NfL and GFAP levels, while accounting for neurological diagnoses, cardiometabolic burden, and substance use. Data were analyzed between July 2025 and March 2026. Main Outcomes and MeasuresDeviations in plasma NfL and GFAP levels from normative predictions. ResultsRelative to the reference population, plasma NfL levels were higher among individuals with bipolar disorder (d=0.20; 95% CI, 0.03-0.37; p=0.03), recurrent depressive disorder (d=0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.38; p=0.009), and depressive episodes (d=0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.10; p=0.01), lower among individuals with anxiety disorders (d=-0.07; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.02; p=0.008), but did not differ in schizophrenia spectrum, stress-related, or other psychiatric disorders. Plasma GFAP levels were not elevated in any psychiatric disorders. Variability in NfL levels was greater among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (variance ratio [VR]=1.30; p=0.005), depressive episodes (VR=1.06; p=0.006), and anxiety disorders (VR=1.08; p=0.005). Variability in GFAP levels was increased only in anxiety disorders (VR=1.08; p=0.01). Plasma NfL levels exceeding percentile-based normative thresholds were more common among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, and depressive episodes. Neurological diagnoses, cardiometabolic burden, and substance use were associated with plasma NfL and GFAP levels. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study provides population-level evidence of plasma NfL elevation in bipolar and depressive disorders and increased variability in schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar and depressive disorders, supporting its potential as a biomarker in psychiatry and informing its ongoing neurological applications. Plasma GFAP levels, in contrast, were largely unaltered across psychiatric disorders. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSAre plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels altered in psychiatric disorders? FindingsIn this cohort study including 47,495 individuals, normative modeling revealed that plasma NfL levels were elevated in bipolar and depressive disorders, whereas plasma GFAP levels were not elevated in any psychiatric disorder. Plasma NfL levels also showed higher variability in schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar, and depressive disorders. MeaningPlasma NfL shows distinct alterations in schizophrenia spectrum and affective disorders, supporting its further investigation as a biomarker in clinical psychiatry and highlighting the need to consider psychiatric comorbidity in neurological applications.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.