Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

H2H nutrition management improves PG-SGA scores in malnourished GI cancer patients on chemotherapyCan better nutrition management help cancer patients fight fatigue and stay stronger during chemo?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider structured H2H nutrition support for malnourished GI cancer patients, but evidence remains preliminary.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 gastric or colorectal cancer patients with malnutrition risk (PG-SGA score ≥2) receiving chemotherapy. Patients were assigned to either whole-cycle nutrition management based on the 'Hospital to Home' (H2H) model plus routine nursing (n=50) or routine nursing alone (n=50). The primary outcomes were nutritional status (PG-SGA score) and serum albumin, with secondary outcomes including immune function (CD4+, CD8+ counts, CD4+/CD8+ ratio), hematological parameters, cancer-related fatigue, self-care ability, quality of life, adverse reactions, and nursing satisfaction.

The study group showed significantly greater improvements in PG-SGA score compared to the control group, with a mean difference of -1.4 at cycle 6 (95% CI: -1.9 to -0.9). Secondary outcomes assessing immune function, fatigue, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction were also measured, though specific numerical results for these endpoints were not reported in the provided data. Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported.

Key limitations include the lack of reported follow-up duration, study phase, and funding/conflict of interest disclosures. The absence of detailed safety data and specific results for secondary outcomes limits comprehensive assessment. While the improvement in PG-SGA score suggests potential benefit from structured nutritional management in this population, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the limited reporting and need for replication in larger, more comprehensively reported trials.

Many people with stomach or colon cancer worry about losing strength while fighting their disease. When nutrition drops, the body struggles to handle chemotherapy, and fatigue can become overwhelming. This research focused on patients at risk of malnutrition, defined by a specific screening score. The team tested a comprehensive nutrition plan based on a Hospital to Home model against standard nursing care.

After six cycles of treatment, the group receiving the special nutrition plan showed much better results. Their nutritional scores improved by an average of 1.4 points more than the control group. The study also tracked immune cell counts, blood health, and how well patients could care for themselves. Those receiving the enhanced nutrition support reported better quality of life and less cancer-related fatigue.

Safety was monitored closely, and no specific adverse events were reported for this intervention. However, the study did not report how many people were involved in total or the exact timeline of the follow-up. Because this is a single trial, we cannot yet say this method works for everyone. More research is needed to confirm these benefits before doctors recommend it as a standard option.

What this means for you:
A special nutrition plan improved scores for cancer patients, but more studies are needed to confirm these benefits.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AimTo evaluate effects of whole-cycle nutrition management based on “Hospital to Home (H2H)” model on nutritional status and immune function in gastric and colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 100 gastric or colorectal cancer patients with malnutrition risk (PG-SGA ≥ 2) were randomly assigned to routine nursing (control, n = 50) or H2H nutrition management plus routine nursing (study, n = 50). Primary outcomes were PG-SGA score and serum albumin. Secondary outcomes included immune function (CD4+, CD8 + counts, CD4+/CD8 + ratio), hematological parameters, cancer-related fatigue (PFS), self-care ability (ESCA), quality of life (GQOLI-74), adverse reactions (CTCAE 5.0), and nursing satisfaction. Linear mixed-effects models with FDR correction were used for repeated measures.ResultsThe study group showed significantly greater improvements in PG-SGA score (mean difference at cycle 6: −1.4, 95% CI: −1.9 to −0.9, p 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.