N/A N=60 EpiFaith Syringe for Epidural Space Detection
Epidural Localization
Primary: Success of Epidural Localization — 18; 30; 0; 0 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=100 Fluoroscopy-guided Versus Traditional Placement of Epidural Catheters
Pain, Postoperative · Pain, Chronic
Primary: Intravenous Pain Medication — 63; 66 milligrams
N/A N=80 Ultrasound-Guided Landmark and Epidural Site Pain
Back Pain · Epidural Analgesia, Obstetric
Primary: Epidural Pressure Sensitivity at Level of Epidural Insertion — 26.8; 26.8; 47.6 force (newtons/cm^2)
N/A N=46 Does Ultrasound Help With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients?
Pregnancy
Primary: Number of Participants With Accurate Epidural Placement — 21; 23 Participants
N/A N=110 Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique
Labor Pain
Primary: Placement Below L3 Vertebra — 49; 49 Participants
N/A N=60 Epidural Anesthesia for Transurethral Resection of The Prostate
Epidural Catheter · Epidural Analgesia · Geriatric Cardiology
Primary: Time to Reach Sensory Block at T10 — 15.25; 10.50; 11.25 Minutes — p=0.05
N/A N=146 Ultrasound for Neuraxial Anesthesia
Lumbar Ultrasound
Primary: Number of Participants With Successful Techniques — 74; 63 Participants — p=0.748
Phase 4 N=12 Distribution, Pharmacokinetics and Extent of Sensory Blockade in ESP Blocks
Distribution of Ropivacaine in Erector Spinae Plane Block
Primary: Area of Dermatomal Sensory Loss at 20 Min — 68.8; 167.5 cm^2
N/A N=18 Use of Ultrasound Guidance to Assist With Labor Epidural Placement in Patients With a BMI ≥40
Labor Pain
Primary: Total Time Required for Epidural Catheter Placement — 6.1; 11.0 Minutes
N/A N=50 Accuracy of Manual Palpation vs Ultrasound for Spinal Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Local · Infant Conditions
Primary: Intended Interspace — 1; 24; 25 Participants
N/A N=11 Epidural Lavage Study for Lumbar Stenosis
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Primary: Visual Analogue Scale — 6.2; 5.0; 5.0; 0.8 score on a scale
N/A N=170 A Trial on Ultrasound-assisted Spinal Anaesthesia
Spinal Anaesthesia · Ultrasound
Primary: Success Rate of First-attempt of Spinal Anaesthesia — 54; 44 participants
N/A N=150 Utility of Ultrasound in Identification of Midline and Placement of Epidural in Severely Obese Parturients
Epidural Anesthesia · Spinal Ultrasound · Obesity
Primary: Time for Epidural Placement — 9.0; 6.2 minutes
Phase 3 N=45 Bupivacaine With Epidural Volume Extension
Spinal Anesthesia · Epidural; Anesthesia
Primary: Time Until PACU Discharge in Minutes — 135; 50 minutes
N/A N=128 Rivanna Ultrasound for Neuraxial Block
Analgesia
Primary: Time to Success of Neuraxial Block Placement — 122; 111; 50; 78.5 seconds
Phase 2 N=66 The Prevention of Hypotension After Epidural Analgesia After Major Surgery
Hypotension · Pain
Primary: Changes Between the 3 Groups Assessed by Blood Pressure Measurement — 5; 2; 3; 10 Participants — p=0.165
N/A N=20 Dispersal Pattern for Spine Injections (Gadolinium Contrast)
Cervical Radiculopathy
Primary: Injection Dispersal Patterns Measured (in cm) in the Superoinferior Directions on Post-injection MRI With a Calibrated Internal Measurement Software. — 14.73 cm
Phase 2 N=74 Transforaminal Versus Lateralized Interlaminar Cervical Epidurals
Cervicogenic Upper Extremity Radiculopathy
Primary: Change in Pain Numerical Rating Scale (Averaged Over Past 24 Hours) — -3.38; -2.30 score on a scale — p=0.057
Phase 4 N=100 Loss of Resistance, w/wo Stimulation, For Epidural Placement
Anesthesia
Primary: Success Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural — 41; 45 Participants
Early Phase 1 N=70 Comparison of Chloroprocaine vs Lidocaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery
Surgical Anesthesia, Cesarean Section
Primary: The Onset Time to Surgical Anesthesia — 558; 655 seconds — p=0.10
Phase 3 N=75 Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation
Labor Pain
Primary: Time to Achieve an Adequate Epidural Level for Labor Analgesia — 7.0; 11.0; 8.5 minutes
Phase 2 N=40 Estimation of the ED95 of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Prilocaine 2% With Sufentanyl for Scheduled Cesarean Delivery
Pregnant Women
Primary: Success of Anesthesia — 4; 4; 4; 1 Participants
Phase 4 N=80 Effects of Epidural Local Anesthetics on Propofol Induction
General Anesthesia · Propofol Target-controlled Infusion · Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia
Primary: Propofol Effect-site Concentration — 1.76; 1.14; 1.09; 1.04 ug/ml
Phase 4 N=50 Optimizing Local Anesthetic Concentration for Continuous Lumbar Plexus Nerve Blocks
Hip Arthroplasty · Hip Pain
Primary: Percent Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Femoris Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) — 64.1; 68 percentage change from baseline of MVIC
Phase 2 N=33 Local Anesthetic Cream in Younger Patients Undergoing Lumbar Punctures
Malignant Neoplasm
Primary: Total Dose of Propofol Administered to Each Patient — 2.94; 3.22 mg/kg — p=0.036
Phase 4 N=79 C7-T1 Epidural Steroid Injections Versus Targeted Injection for Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain
Radicular; Neuropathic, Cervical · Neck Pain
Primary: Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Pain Reduction on the Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for Pain — 60; 72 percentage of participants — p=0.23
N/A N=38 A Real-Time Ultrasound Guided Approach For Spinal Anesthesia
Patients Aged 55 or Older · BMI More Than 40 kg/m2 · Scoliosis
Primary: Number of Attempts — 1; 1 Attempts — p=0.83
N/A N=91 Intrapartum Epidural Catheter Displacement: Dressing Methods
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Primary: Epidural Catheter Migration — 44; 25; 17 percentage patients catheter migration
N/A N=36 A Prospective Observational Study of Epidural Pressures During Caudal Epidural in the Pediatric Population
Anesthesia, Caudal
Primary: Pressure in the Caudal Epidural Space — 192.5 mmHg
Phase 4 N=400 Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial (LESS Trial)
Spinal Stenosis · Low Back Pain
Primary: Roland Morris — 11.8; 12.5 units on a scale