Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Opioid-free perioperative regimens associated with lower pain scores and fewer side effects in hip arthroplastyOpioid-free Pain Management Shows Better Results for Hip Surgery Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider opioid-free perioperative regimens to reduce pain scores and side effects like nausea in hip arthroplasty.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of opioid-free perioperative regimens compared to opioid-based regimens in 1681 adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcomes were rest and movement visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. The analysis found that opioid-free regimens were associated with lower movement VAS scores at 12 h (MD -1.43; 95% CI: -2.66 to -0.20, p = 0.022) and 24 h (MD -1.18; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.10, p = 0.032). Additionally, resting VAS scores were lower in the opioid-free group at 12 h (MD -1.51; 95% CI: -2.89 to -0.13, p = 0.032) and 24 h (MD -1.12; 95% CI: -1.94 to -0.29, p = 0.008).

Secondary outcomes indicated that opioid-free analgesia decreased postoperative side effects, specifically nausea and pruritus. No significant differences were observed in vomiting, headache, urinary retention, antiemetic administration, operation time, or blood loss. The authors noted considerable variability in VAS scores as a limitation.

Clinical application is tempered by the fact that the GRADE assessment for VAS scores ranged from very low to low certainty. However, the certainty for nausea, pruritus, and vomiting ranged from moderate to high. These findings suggest that opioid-free regimens may offer a viable alternative for managing pain and reducing specific side effects in hip arthroplasty patients.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in managing perioperative pain for hip arthroplasty. While previous coverage noted that no genetic variants were found to predict inpatient opioid use after joint arthroplasty, this study provides evidence that opioid-free regimens are associated with lower VAS pain scores and fewer side effects like nausea and pruritus. The findings offer a non-pharmacological approach to reducing opioid-related complications in this specific surgical population.

A meta-analysis of 1,681 adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty compared two different ways to manage pain after surgery. One group received an opioid-based regimen, while the other received an opioid-free regimen. The study looked at pain scores, side effects, and overall recovery during the first 24 hours after the procedure.

Researchers found that patients in the opioid-free group reported lower pain scores at both 12 and 24 hours after surgery. These scores measured both resting pain and pain during movement. Additionally, the opioid-free group experienced fewer side effects like nausea and itching. There were no significant differences found in other areas, such as vomiting, headaches, or overall patient satisfaction.

It is important to note that the evidence for pain scores has a range of low to very low certainty due to variations in how patients reported their pain. However, the evidence for fewer side effects like nausea and itching is more certain. Patients should talk to their doctors about these findings to see if an opioid-free plan is appropriate for their specific needs.

What this means for you:
Opioid-free plans may lead to lower pain scores and fewer side effects for patients after hip replacement surgery.

Common questions

Does an opioid-free plan reduce side effects after hip surgery?

Yes, the study found that opioid-free regimens were associated with fewer side effects, specifically less nausea and itching (pruritus). There were no significant differences in other side effects like vomiting, headache, or urinary retention between the two groups.

How much did pain scores differ between the two groups?

Patients in the opioid-free group reported lower pain scores at both 12 and 24 hours after surgery. These scores were measured for both resting pain and pain during movement. However, researchers noted there was considerable variability in these pain scores.

Is the evidence for these findings strong?

The certainty of the evidence varies. The findings regarding pain scores have low to very low certainty. The findings regarding fewer side effects, such as nausea and itching, have moderate to high certainty.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,681
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Hip arthroplasty is a standard surgical procedure to decrease joint pain. Opioid-based regimens have historically been used to treat postoperative pain; however, opioid-free regimens are increasingly employed due to the increased risk of dependence and adverse events. This systematic review aimed to compare patient outcomes following opioid-based and opioid-free perioperative regimens in hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central from inception to December 2024 and updated the search in May 2025. Only clinical trials comparing opioid-based and opioid-free regimens in which adult patients underwent total hip arthroplasty were included. The co-primary outcomes were the rest visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and the movement VAS pain score. The secondary outcomes were nausea, vomiting, pruritus, cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h, antiemetic administration, headache, urinary retention, operation time, and blood loss. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework to assess the quality of evidence for the main outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 6354 articles, with 28 trials included and only 26 trials analyzed involving 1681 patients (opioid-based group: 835, opioid-free group: 846). For the co-primary outcomes, the opioid-free group experienced lower scores on the movement VAS at both 12 and 24 h compared to the opioid-based group, showing a mean difference (MD -1.43, 95% CI: -2.66 to -0.20, p =  0.022) and (MD -1.18, 95% CI: [-2.25 to -0.10], p =  0.032), respectively. Furthermore, the opioid-free group had lower scores on the resting VAS at 12 and 24 h compared to the opioid-based group (MD -1.51, 95% CI: -2.89 to -0.13, p =  0.032) and (MD -1.12, 95% CI: -1.94 to -0.29, p =  0.008), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study found that the opioid-free regimens, compared to the opioid-based, were associated with lower VAS pain scores, though with considerable variability. Also, opioid-free analgesia decreased postoperative side effects, especially opioid side effects like nausea and pruritus. However, there was no difference in outcomes, including vomiting, headache, urinary retention, antiemetic use, and overall satisfaction. For the VAS scores, the GARDE assessment ranged from very low to low certainty; on the other hand, the certainty of evidence for vomiting, nausea, and pruritus ranged from moderate to high. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD420250637286).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.