Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Antiplatelet monotherapy after ultrashort DAPT shows no statistically significant difference in major bleeding or MACETrial Shows Antiplatelet Monotherapy Options for Coronary Artery Disease

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that antiplatelet monotherapy after ultrashort DAPT shows no statistically significant difference in bleeding or MACE.

This network meta-analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet monotherapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticagrelor) following an ultrashort course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with coronary artery disease at high bleeding risk. The primary outcomes assessed were major bleeding (BARC) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

For major bleeding, the odds ratios (ORs) compared to DAPT were 0.26 for aspirin, 0.28 for clopidogrel, and 0.42 for ticagrelor monotherapy. However, none of these results reached statistical significance (95% CI: 0.05 to 1.42 for aspirin; 0.07 to 1.15 for clopidogrel; 0.17 to 1.08 for ticagrelor). No significant differences were observed for MACE, all-cause death, or stroke compared to DAPT. While ticagrelor monotherapy showed numerically favorable estimates for MACE and major bleeding, these did not reach statistical significance.

The authors note several limitations, including a sparse network and indirect evidence for myocardial infarction estimates. Consequently, the certainty of evidence is low. Current evidence is insufficient to determine if antiplatelet monotherapy after ultrashort DAPT reduces major bleeding compared with DAPT in this specific high-risk population.

How this fits prior evidence

This finding addresses a gap in managing patients with coronary artery disease at high bleeding risk. While previous evidence confirmed that systematic screening for silent myocardial ischemia does not reduce major cardiovascular outcomes in asymptomatic diabetic patients, this study focuses on the specific transition from ultrashort DAPT to monotherapy. The results do not currently provide a definitive basis for choosing monotherapy over DAPT to reduce bleeding risk.

Researchers looked at how different heart medications affect patients with coronary artery disease. Specifically, they studied patients at high risk of bleeding who underwent a procedure called percutaneous coronary intervention. The study compared using a single antiplatelet drug (monotherapy) after a very short period of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) against staying on dual therapy.

The analysis looked at major bleeding, heart attacks, and strokes. While some numbers suggested that switching to a single drug like aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticagrelor might lower bleeding risks, these results were not statistically significant. This means the data did not clearly prove that one method was safer than the other.

Because the evidence is based on a sparse network and indirect data, the certainty of these findings is low. Currently, there is not enough evidence to confirm if switching to monotherapy after a short dual therapy period actually reduces bleeding. Patients should talk to their doctors to determine the safest medication plan for their specific needs.

What this means for you:
Current evidence is not strong enough to determine if monotherapy reduces bleeding risks for these heart patients.

Common questions

Is switching to a single antiplatelet drug safer for heart patients?

The study looked at whether switching to a single drug (monotherapy) after a short period of dual therapy reduced major bleeding. While some numbers were lower for aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor, the results were not statistically significant. This means the study could not confirm if one method is safer than the other.

What are the risks of different medications like ticagrelor?

The study compared ticagrelor monotherapy to dual antiplatelet therapy. While ticagrelor showed some numerically favorable estimates for major bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events, these results did not reach statistical significance. Because the evidence is of low certainty, it is not clear how these drugs differ in safety.

Who is this finding relevant for?

This research specifically looked at patients with coronary artery disease who are at a high risk of bleeding and are not taking oral anticoagulants. Because the evidence is limited and the data is sparse, patients should consult their doctors to decide on the best treatment plan.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThe optimal antiplatelet monotherapy maintenance strategy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain in patients with coronary artery disease at high bleeding risk, particularly among those not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of different antiplatelet monotherapy strategies after an ultrashort course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials from database inception to July 1, 2026. Randomized controlled trials and subgroup analyses of randomized trials were eligible if they enrolled high bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI who were not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy and compared antiplatelet monotherapy strategies with DAPT or with another monotherapy strategy. The primary safety outcome was BARC major bleeding, and the primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and stroke. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis.ResultsAll six included studies informed the drug-specific network meta-analysis. Compared with DAPT, the ORs for major bleeding were 0.26 (95% CI, 0.05–1.42) for aspirin, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.07–1.15) for clopidogrel, and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.17–1.08) for ticagrelor monotherapy. All three confidence intervals were wide and compatible with both lower and higher odds of major bleeding. No significant differences were observed for MACE, all-cause death, or stroke. The higher MI estimates for clopidogrel and aspirin require cautious interpretation given the sparse network and indirect evidence.ConclusionsIn patients at high bleeding risk undergoing PCI who were not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy, the available evidence was insufficient to determine whether antiplatelet monotherapy after ultrashort DAPT reduces major bleeding compared with DAPT. Ticagrelor monotherapy showed numerically favorable estimates for MACE and major bleeding compared with DAPT, but neither comparison reached statistical significance. However, the sparse evidence network and low certainty of evidence warrant cautious interpretation.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420261448916, PROSPERO CRD420261448916.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.