Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Islatravir 60 mg oral qm showed 64.3% adverse event rate compared to 77.1% in comparatorTrial Shows Islatravir Shows Tolerable Safety Profile for HIV Prevention

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that islatravir 60 mg qm was well tolerated with 64.3% adverse events, but primary efficacy data is missing.

This Phase 3 randomized trial enrolled 494 cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men and are at increased likelihood of HIV-1 exposure. The study evaluated islatravir 60 mg oral qm against a comparator of emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) coformulated with either tenofovir disoproxil (245 mg) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF; 25 mg) once daily. The follow-up period included a 9.0 month blinded phase.

In the islatravir group, 64.3% of participants experienced adverse events compared to 77.1% in the comparator group. No HIV infections were reported in either group. At Month 3, the islatravir group showed a decrease of 7.4% in total lymphocytes. Serious adverse events occurred in less than 2% of participants, and none were related to the study product.

Islatravir qm was generally well tolerated, with only 1 adverse event leading to product discontinuation due to gastroesophageal reflux. However, the study was stopped early, meaning the original primary efficacy objectives were not assessed. Clinical application is currently limited by the lack of complete efficacy data.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This trial provides data on the safety and tolerability of islatravir 60 mg oral qm. It extends the body of evidence regarding islatravir, which was previously reported to meet non-inferiority goals in a combination with lenacapavir and to show reduced virological failure risk when combined with doravirine.

This Phase 3 trial looked at the safety and tolerability of islatravir, a medication being studied for HIV-1 prevention. The study included 494 participants, including cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men and are at an increased risk of HIV-1 exposure. The trial lasted 9 months during a blinded phase.

Researchers compared islatravir to a combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir. The results showed that 64.3% of people taking islatravir reported adverse events, while 77.1% of those in the comparison group reported them. Most of these side effects were mild or moderate. Only one person had to stop taking islatravir due to gastroesophageal reflux.

While the study did not reach its primary goals because it stopped early, it did track safety data. One finding showed a 7.4% decrease in total lymphocytes at the three-month mark for those taking islatravir. Because the study was stopped early, the full effectiveness of the drug is not yet known. Patients should talk to their doctor about how these findings relate to their specific health needs.

What this means for you:
Islatravir was generally well tolerated in this trial, with fewer reported side effects than the comparison group.

Common questions

Is islatravir safe for people at risk of HIV?

In this Phase 3 trial, islatravir was generally well tolerated. Most side effects reported by the 64.3% of participants who experienced them were mild or moderate. Serious adverse events occurred in less than 2% of cases and were not linked to the study medication.

How did islatravir compare to other treatments in this study?

The study compared islatravir to a combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir. The islatravir group reported fewer adverse events (64.3%) than the comparison group (77.1%). Only one person had to stop taking islatravir due to gastroesophageal reflux.

What were the specific side effects found?

The study reported that most side effects were mild or moderate. One specific finding was a 7.4% decrease in total lymphocytes at the three-month mark for those taking islatravir. You should speak with a healthcare provider to discuss how these results apply to your health.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 494
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up9.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Islatravir once monthly (qm), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with a long half-life, was evaluated for safety and tolerability in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men and are at increased likelihood of HIV-1 (HIV) exposure. METHODS: IMPOWER-24 (NCT04652700) was a double-blind, Phase 3 study. Participants were randomized 2:1 to islatravir 60 mg oral qm or emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) coformulated with either tenofovir disoproxil (245 mg) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF; 25 mg) once daily (qd). After ∼9 months, blinded islatravir was discontinued due to lymphocyte reductions; participants were offered open-label comparator for 20 months. RESULTS: In total, 494 participants were enrolled (328 islatravir; 166 comparator): 91.5% were cisgender men, 41.7% were White, and median age was 27 years. Mean blinded dosing duration was 4.7 months (islatravir) versus 4.3 months (comparator). Overall, 211 participants (64.3%) in the islatravir group and 128 (77.1%) in the comparator group had ≥1 adverse event (AE). Most AEs were mild or moderate, with 1 AE leading to product discontinuation (islatravir; gastroesophageal reflux). Serious AEs occurred in <2%; none were related to study product. Change in total lymphocytes in the islatravir group at Month 3 was -7.4%; a trend toward recovery was observed after islatravir was stopped. Mean total lymphocytes remained within normal range. No HIV infections occurred in either group during the double-blind phase. CONCLUSIONS: Islatravir qm was generally well tolerated; decreases in total lymphocytes were observed with islatravir. Original primary efficacy objectives were not assessed due to early study stoppage.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.