This review analyzed data from 4000 adults receiving intravenous tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg for acute ischemic stroke. The intervention targeted patients treated beyond 4.5 hours from last known well or those with wake-up strokes. The primary focus was on 90-day functional outcomes measured by the modified Rankin Scale.
Results indicated a modest increase in excellent functional outcomes, defined as mRS 0-1, with a relative risk of 1.12. Favorable outcomes, encompassing mRS 0-2, also showed a modest improvement with a relative risk of 1.06. Despite these gains in recovery, the safety profile raised significant concerns regarding bleeding complications.
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred significantly more often in the treatment group, showing a relative risk of 1.86. In contrast, mortality rates remained unchanged between the groups. GRADE certainty was high for favorable outcomes and death, while moderate for other secondary endpoints like reperfusion and parenchymal hematoma type 2.
The study suggests careful use of imaging-selected patients is necessary. Clinicians must weigh the potential for better functional recovery against the elevated risk of serious bleeding events when considering this intervention outside the standard time window.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg in the extended time window.
METHODS: MEDLINE was searched via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to February 2026, with trial registries also screened. Eligible trials were RCTs of adults treated beyond 4.5 h from last known well or with wake-up stroke, comparing IV tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg with placebo or standard care. Primary efficacy outcomes were 90-day mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2, and primary safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. RoB 2 and GRADE were used to assess risk of bias and certainty. Risk ratios were pooled using a random effects model.
RESULTS: Nine RCTs, including 4,000 participants, met eligibility criteria. Tenecteplase was associated with a modest increase in excellent functional outcome (9 studies, 4000 patients, RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.027 to 1.22, p = 0.01, I: 14.9%) and favorable functional outcome (9 studies, 4000 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11, p = 0.0091, I: 10.6%). Tenecteplase showed a significantly higher risk of sICH (9 studies, 4000 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.065 to 3.24, p = 0.029, I: 21.8%), while no difference was found in death (9 studies, 4000 patients, RR 1.006, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.19, p = 0.95, I: 35.5%). GRADE certainty was high for favorable outcome and death, and moderate for excellent outcome, sICH, reperfusion, and parenchymal hematoma type 2.
CONCLUSIONS: In extended window acute ischemic stroke, tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg improved 90-day functional outcomes and increased reperfusion, but it increased intracranial hemorrhage, including sICH. These findings support careful use in imaging selected patients, with attention to bleeding risk.