For people who wake up with a stroke or arrive at the hospital late, every minute counts. A large review of 4,000 adults treated beyond the usual 4.5-hour window looked at a clot-busting drug called tenecteplase. The study found a modest increase in excellent and favorable recovery at 90 days. But it also found a significantly higher risk of serious bleeding in the brain. The drug did not change the risk of death. This analysis combined data from multiple studies, so the results are more reliable than any single trial. The findings suggest tenecteplase can help some patients, but only with careful imaging to select those most likely to benefit and least likely to bleed. The certainty of the evidence was high for recovery and death, and moderate for bleeding risk. The review did not report specific patient counts or how long each study lasted.
IV tenecteplase beyond 4.5 hours shows modest benefit but higher bleeding risk in acute ischemic stroke patientsTenecteplase shows modest benefit for late stroke treatment
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This review analyzed data from 4000 adults receiving intravenous tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg for acute ischemic stroke. The intervention targeted patients treated beyond 4.5 hours from last known well or those with wake-up strokes. The primary focus was on 90-day functional outcomes measured by the modified Rankin Scale.
Results indicated a modest increase in excellent functional outcomes, defined as mRS 0-1, with a relative risk of 1.12. Favorable outcomes, encompassing mRS 0-2, also showed a modest improvement with a relative risk of 1.06. Despite these gains in recovery, the safety profile raised significant concerns regarding bleeding complications.
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred significantly more often in the treatment group, showing a relative risk of 1.86. In contrast, mortality rates remained unchanged between the groups. GRADE certainty was high for favorable outcomes and death, while moderate for other secondary endpoints like reperfusion and parenchymal hematoma type 2.
The study suggests careful use of imaging-selected patients is necessary. Clinicians must weigh the potential for better functional recovery against the elevated risk of serious bleeding events when considering this intervention outside the standard time window.