Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Tranexamic acid does not improve mortality or neurological outcomes in acute brain injuryTranexamic acid does not improve survival in acute brain injuries

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that tranexamic acid does not improve mortality or neurological outcomes in acute brain injury cases.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of tranexamic acid in over 12,000 hospitalized adults with acute brain injuries, including traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. The study aimed to determine if tranexamic acid influenced mortality rates or functional outcomes following these neurological events.

The meta-analysis found no statistically significant effect on short-term mortality (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.00) or long-term mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.13). Furthermore, tranexamic acid did not improve the proportion of patients with functional independence (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.03) or reduce the risk of functional dependence or death (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.07).

Regarding secondary outcomes, no significant difference was found for thromboembolic events (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.52). Evidence regarding intracranial rebleeding was inconclusive due to substantial between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 72%). The authors note that tranexamic acid did not improve all-cause mortality or neurological outcomes in hemorrhagic acute brain injury, and the clinical utility for preventing rebleeding remains uncertain.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in evidence regarding the role of tranexamic acid specifically for acute brain injuries. While prior coverage noted that preoperative tranexamic acid did not reduce transfusion rates in geriatric patients with hip fractures, this study confirms that tranexamic acid also fails to improve mortality or functional outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

When someone suffers a severe brain injury, like a stroke or a head injury from an accident, every second counts. Doctors often look for ways to stop bleeding and improve the chances of a full recovery. One common medication used in these situations is tranexamic acid.

A large-scale review of over 12,000 hospitalized patients looked at whether this drug actually helped those with various types of brain bleeds. The researchers compared patients who received the medicine against those who received a placebo. They tracked critical factors like survival rates and how well patients could function on their own after the injury.

The results showed that tranexamic acid did not lead to better survival rates in the short or long term. It also did not improve the number of people who regained their independence. While the data was unclear regarding whether it prevented bleeding from starting again, the overall evidence suggests it does not change primary outcomes for these patients.

What this means for you:
Tranexamic acid does not improve survival or functional recovery in patients with acute brain injuries.

Common questions

Does tranexamic acid help people survive a brain injury?

No. The study of over 12,000 patients found that tranexamic acid did not have a statistically significant effect on short-term or long-term mortality for those with acute brain injuries.

Does this medicine help patients regain their independence?

The data shows no improvement in the proportion of patients who achieved functional independence. It also did not reduce the risk of death or staying dependent on others after an injury.

Can tranexamic acid stop a brain bleed from happening again?

The evidence is currently inconclusive regarding whether tranexamic acid prevents intracranial rebleeding. Because there was a lot of variation between different studies, the results for this specific outcome are not clear.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundHemorrhagic acute brain injury—encompassing traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage—carries substantial morbidity and mortality. Active hemorrhage and hematoma progression constitute shared pathological mechanisms across these conditions. As a lysine analog anti-fibrinolytic, tranexamic acid (TXA) has demonstrated mortality reduction in extracranial bleeding; however, its efficacy and safety in intracranial hemorrhagic lesions remain inconclusive. Prior systematic reviews predominantly targeted single disease categories, inadequately assessed core outcomes such as all-cause mortality and neurological functional recovery, and seldom applied the Risk of Bias 2 tool or GRADE framework for methodological appraisal. Therefore, an updated meta-analysis is warranted to re-evaluate the overall clinical value of TXA in hemorrhagic acute brain injury.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of TXA on neurological outcomes and all-cause mortality in adults with acute brain injury.MethodsThis meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261400869). In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing TXA with placebo in hospitalized adults with acute brain injury, including traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework, pooled effect estimates were generated using a random-effects model, heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic, and robustness was tested through leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The primary outcomes were neurological outcomes and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and intracranial rebleeding.ResultsSeven high-quality randomized controlled trials comprising over 12,000 patients were included. Random-effects model analyses showed no statistically significant effect of TXA on short-term mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.00) or long-term mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91–1.13). For neurological outcomes, TXA neither improved the proportion of patients with functional independence (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92–1.03) nor reduced the risk of functional dependence or death (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96–1.07). For rebleeding, the pooled estimate showed no statistically significant effect (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59–1.11), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 72%). The current evidence is inconclusive regarding a protective effect of TXA on rebleeding. The incidence of thromboembolic events did not differ significantly between groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.90–1.52). Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses indicated that the primary outcomes were robust.ConclusionTXA did not improve all-cause mortality or neurological outcomes in hemorrhagic acute brain injury, and the evidence for its effect on rebleeding remains inconclusive.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, CRD420261400869.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.