This retrospective cross-sectional study examined 1105 participants recruited via an online crowdsourcing platform who had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of arachnoiditis. The primary objective was to characterize patient-reported clinical presentation, comorbidities, aggravating factors, and treatments. Data were collected to describe symptomatology, diagnostic patterns, and therapeutic experiences within this specific population.
The most frequently reported symptoms were lower back pain, experienced by 43.5% of participants, followed by leg pain at 41.6% and general back pain at 39.1%. Regarding functional aggravating factors, 62.5% of participants reported prolonged sitting as a trigger, while 58.3% identified prolonged standing as an aggravating factor. Comorbid conditions were prevalent, with 32.3% having degenerative disc disease, 25.3% having spinal stenosis, and 25.0% having fibromyalgia.
Treatment utilization and perceived effectiveness varied significantly. Medication usage included gabapentin (37.9%), pregabalin (26.5%), and low-dose naltrexone. Perceived effectiveness was reported for low-dose naltrexone (28.1%, 90% CI 20.0-37.0), ketamine infusion (24.8%, 90% CI 16.9-33.4), and fentanyl (21.1%, 90% CI 14.7-28.1). Conversely, 38.5% of participants reported epidural corticosteroid injections as detrimental (90% CI 28.0-45.9). Other treatments, such as physiotherapy, were used by 30.1% of the cohort. No specific safety data, adverse events, or discontinuation rates were reported in the provided evidence.
Key limitations of this study include its retrospective cross-sectional design, reliance on an online crowdsourcing platform, and lack of control for potential selection bias. Because the study is observational, it cannot establish causal relationships between treatments and outcomes. The reported percentages reflect patient perceptions and prevalence within this specific cohort rather than generalizable clinical efficacy. Clinicians should interpret these findings as descriptive data regarding the arachnoiditis patient experience rather than evidence for standard treatment protocols.
View Original Abstract ↓
Abstract Background Arachnoiditis, a painful and potentially disabling neurological condition, results from persistent inflammation of the spinal cord pia-arachnoid membranes following injury. While considered rare, the condition is underdiagnosed. Research on symptomatology, diagnosis, and treatments is scarce, hindering clinical management. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising opportunities for rare diseases, enabling large-scale pattern identification. This study used traditional research methods coupled with AI technology to characterize patient-reported clinical presentation, comorbidities, aggravating factors, and treatments for arachnoiditis. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized data from StuffThatWorks (STW), an online crowdsourcing platform for people with chronic diseases. Multiple choice and free text responses were assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Novel AI/machine learning algorithms were used to further analyze the data, including the STW cross-condition score (higher scores more indicative of arachnoiditis) and the STW treatment efficacy model generating effectiveness and detriment estimates, with binomial proportion 90% confidence intervals. Results Of 1250 international participants, 1105 reporting a physician-confirmed diagnosis were included. Participants were predominantly USA-based (71.4%), female (75.9%) and [≥]46 years old (73.1%). Of 712 symptoms grouped into eight categories, eighteen were more indicative of arachnoiditis (by cross-condition score). The most frequent symptoms were lower back pain (43.5%), leg pain (41.6%) and back pain (39.1%). Prolonged sitting (62.5%) and prolonged standing (58.3%) were the most common aggravating factors. Comorbidities were led by degenerative disc disease (32.3%), spinal stenosis (25.3%) and fibromyalgia (25.0%). The most frequently used treatments were gabapentin (37.9%), physiotherapy (30.1%) and pregabalin (26.5%). Treatments with the highest patient-rated effectiveness (by STW model, 90% CI) were low-dose naltrexone (28.1%, CI 20.0-37.0), ketamine infusion (24.8%, CI 16.9-33.4) and fentanyl (21.1%, CI 14.7-28.1). Epidural corticosteroid injections showed the highest detriment (38.5%, CI 28.0-45.9). Conclusion As the largest observational study of arachnoiditis to date, made possible with novel methodological approaches, this work offers new insights with potential to improve diagnosis and management.