Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

HER2, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and CLDN18.2 biomarkers may guide treatment selection in gastric cancer conversion therapyBiomarkers help doctors choose better treatments for gastric cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while biomarkers may identify treatment-sensitive disease, they do not currently confirm improved surgical outcomes.

This narrative review examines the role of specific biomarkers, including HER2, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and CLDN18.2, in the management of patients with gastric cancer who are candidates for conversion therapy. The review synthesizes how these markers may inform treatment selection, response prediction, and the timing of surgical intervention.

Key findings suggest that HER2 status can guide anti-HER2 therapy, while PD-L1 and MSI-H/dMMR status may identify patients suitable for immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. Additionally, CLDN18.2 is identified as a potential targeted option for patients with HER2-negative disease. These biomarkers may assist in identifying treatment-sensitive disease to inform clinical decision-making.

However, the authors note significant limitations in the current evidence. The data are extrapolated from palliative or metastatic settings and do not demonstrate improved conversion-surgery rates, R0-resection rates, pathological response, or postoperative disease-free survival in conversion-therapy populations. Clinical utility is currently limited to identifying candidates for reassessment, as surgical eligibility still requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment.

How this fits prior evidence

This narrative review addresses a gap in the clinical utility of specific biomarkers for conversion therapy in gastric cancer. It complements existing evidence regarding the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer and the use of radiomics for predicting microsatellite instability status. While the review identifies biomarkers to guide treatment selection, it does not confirm the specific improvements in surgical outcomes or pathological response mentioned in other reports.

When a patient is diagnosed with gastric cancer that cannot be immediately removed by surgery, the next steps are critical. Doctors must decide which treatments will work best to shrink the tumor. New research highlights how specific markers, or biological signs, can guide these difficult decisions.

These markers include HER2, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and CLDN18.2. Each one tells a different story about the cancer. For example, HER2 status can point toward specific targeted therapies, while PD-L1 and MSI-H markers help identify patients who might do well with immunotherapy. For those with HER2-negative disease, the CLDN18.2 marker offers a new targeted option.

While these markers help identify treatment-sensitive disease, they are not a magic fix. The current evidence does not yet prove that these markers improve surgical success rates or long-term survival. Doctors still use a broad, team-based approach to decide if a patient is ready for surgery, but these markers provide a clearer map for choosing the right initial treatment.

What this means for you:
Specific biomarkers help doctors tailor treatments for gastric cancer and identify patients who may respond well to therapy.

Common questions

What are the biomarkers used for gastric cancer?

Doctors look at several markers: HER2, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and CLDN18.2. These markers help determine which treatments, such as immunotherapy or targeted therapies, are most appropriate for a patient's specific type of gastric cancer.

How do these markers help with surgery?

These markers help identify patients with treatment-sensitive disease. This helps doctors decide which patients might benefit from specific therapies before they are reassessed for surgery. However, the evidence does not yet show improved surgical success rates.

What does the CLDN18.2 marker do?

The CLDN18.2 marker provides a new targeted option for patients whose gastric cancer is HER2-negative. It helps doctors find specific treatment paths for those who cannot use HER2-targeted therapies.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Most patients with gastric cancer considered for conversion therapy present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, where surgery alone or conventional chemotherapy often provides limited benefit. Conversion therapy aims to reduce tumor burden through systemic treatment, reassess treatment response over time, and create an opportunity for radical surgery with complete tumor removal. This approach is mainly considered for patients with initially unresectable, borderline resectable, or limited metastatic disease. However, because not all patients benefit from this strategy, careful selection of those most likely to respond to systemic therapy and proceed to surgery is essential. With the development of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, conversion therapy for gastric cancer has shifted from empiric chemotherapy toward biomarker-guided individualized treatment. HER2 status may guide anti-HER2 therapy, PD-L1 may help identify patients who benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, MSI-H/dMMR suggests greater sensitivity to immunotherapy, and CLDN18.2 provides a new targeted option, particularly for HER2-negative disease. This review examines the clinical value of HER2, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and CLDN18.2 in treatment selection, response prediction, repeated reassessment, and surgical timing. These biomarkers may help identify patients with treatment-sensitive disease who warrant surgical reassessment. However, because most supporting evidence is extrapolated from palliative/metastatic or perioperative trials, such evidence should not be interpreted as demonstrating improved conversion-surgery or R0-resection rates, pathological response, or postoperative disease-free survival in conversion-therapy populations; surgical eligibility remains dependent on comprehensive clinical and multidisciplinary assessment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.