Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Smartphone app reduces psychological distress at 3 months with Cohen d -0.17Smartphone app reduces workplace stress for some workers in Japan

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that smartphone apps may reduce workplace psychological distress at 3 months, but benefits are not sustained at 6 months.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 793 workers in Japan who owned compatible smartphones and were not currently absent from work. Participants were assigned to either a stand-alone smartphone app that passively monitored physical activity and psychological distress or a booklet on job stress. The primary outcome was psychological distress measured by the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.

At 3 months, the intervention group showed a significant decrease in psychological distress compared to the control group (mean difference -0.56; Cohen d -0.17; 95% CI -1.11 to -0.02; P=.04). A larger effect was observed in a subgroup with minimal baseline distress (mean difference -0.63; Cohen d -0.19; 95% CI -1.16 to -0.11; P=.02). However, this reduction in distress was not sustained at the 6-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes showed that while self-reported physical activity declined in both groups, digitally recorded activity duration increased by 7.92 minutes (95% CI 1.36-14.49; P=.02) in the intervention group during the 3-month period. Safety data and discontinuation rates were not reported. Limitations include the lack of sustained effects at 6 months, the inability to compare digital activity data between groups, and uncertainty regarding whether improvements were driven by biological or psychosocial mechanisms.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in workplace-specific mental health interventions. While previous coverage noted that universal digital mental health interventions show significant effects for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents at 6 months, the current study shows that a similar mHealth intervention for workers did not sustain its effect beyond 3 months. It also contrasts with findings where pharmacological interventions like mirtazapine or olanzapine were used to manage distress in specific patient populations.

Workplace stress can take a heavy toll on mental health. To see if technology could help, researchers studied 793 workers in Japan who used smartphones. One group used a specialized app that tracked their physical activity and psychological distress for three months, while the other group received a booklet about job stress.

The results showed that those using the app experienced a significant drop in psychological distress at the three-month mark compared to those who only read the booklet. Interestingly, the study found a larger improvement among workers who started with very little stress. During the trial, the app users also recorded more physical activity than they did previously.

While the initial results were promising, the reduction in stress was not sustained after six months. Additionally, researchers noted that while the app showed potential for workplace mental health, the actual size of the improvement was modest. It is still unclear if the lower stress levels were caused by the app's features or simply by the increase in physical activity.

What this means for you:
A smartphone app can lower work-related distress for three months, but the effects may not last long-term.

Common questions

How did the app help with stress?

The app passively monitored physical activity and psychological distress for three months. Workers using the app showed a significant decrease in distress compared to those who received a booklet. However, this improvement was not sustained at the six-month follow-up.

Who was included in this study?

The study included 793 workers in Japan who were aged 18 or older and owned compatible smartphones. The participants were currently employed and not absent from work at the time of the study.

Did the app increase physical activity?

Yes, data recorded by the app showed that users increased their physical activity duration by about 8 minutes during the three-month period. However, self-reported physical activity levels actually declined in both the app group and the booklet group.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 397
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Although mobile health (mHealth) interventions serve as potential solutions for addressing mental health problems, evidence on whether mHealth interventions targeting physical activity can reduce psychological distress among generally healthy workers is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a stand-alone smartphone app, which passively monitors physical activity and psychological distress, in reducing psychological distress among workers. METHODS: This open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted in Japan over 6 months, with assessments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Eligible participants were workers aged 18 years or older who were able to complete the Japanese questionnaires and owned compatible smartphones. Individuals currently absent from work or with a history of absence due to sickness within the past 12 months were excluded. Participants were randomized (1:1) to the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group used a smartphone app that passively monitored physical activity and mental health for 3 months. The control group received a booklet on job stress. The primary outcome was psychological distress measured using the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Secondary outcomes included self-reported physical activity and digitally recorded activity duration in the intervention group. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. For the main analysis, linear mixed modeling for repeated measures was used to estimate between-group differences in changes in psychological distress across the 3 time points. RESULTS: A total of 793 workers were randomized (intervention: n=397; control: n=396). Psychological distress decreased significantly in the intervention group at 3 months (mean difference -0.56, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.02; P=.04; Cohen d -0.17), although this effect was not sustained at 6 months. Self-reported physical activity levels declined in both groups without significant between-group differences. In contrast, in the intervention group, digitally recorded activity increased during the intervention period (7.92 min increase, 95% CI 1.36-14.49; P=.02); however, these data were not comparable with those in the control group. Subgroup analysis showed a larger effect among participants with no or minimal baseline distress (mean difference -0.63, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.11; P=.02; Cohen d -0.19). CONCLUSIONS: The stand-alone smartphone-based app that enables workers to monitor physical activity and psychological distress modestly reduced psychological distress among workers. However, it remains unclear whether the app reduces psychological distress through biological and psychosocial mechanisms, including increased physical activity. Furthermore, the benefit may be short-lived rather than durable and may have limited clinical and practical significance. Although mHealth interventions may contribute to preventing mental health problems in workplace settings, booster engagement strategies are necessary to sustain benefits over time. Subgroup analyses suggested that the app may be more effective among generally healthy populations.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.