HCP Mode — summaries include clinical detail, trial data, and statistical outcomes.
Patient Mode — summaries use plain language, avoiding clinical jargon.
1 published article · Updated continuously
56 trials tracked for Back Pain: 17 in phase 3 or 4 and 3 with published results. The most-cited published study has 144 citations.
Showing the 50 most-cited and recently-updated of 56 trials. Browse the full registry →
Trial data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. Counts describe the research landscape and are not a treatment recommendation. Informational only — not medical advice.
Pharmacological interventions for back pain show varying degrees of efficacy. Optimal Medical Management (OMM) demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of subjects achieving a ≥50% reduction in low back pain intensity compared to the control group (p=0.036), with significant improvements in both low back pain and leg pain intensity on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (p<0.001). Oxycodone/Naloxone was associated with a statistically significant reduction in average daily pain scores at week 12 (p=0.002).
Opioid and non-opioid medications showed mixed results in specific metrics. Buprenorphine transdermal patch resulted in significant reductions in 'Pain on the Average' and 'Pain Right Now' scores between days 21-84 (p<0.05). Preservative-free morphine sulfate (PFMS) showed a significant reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain intensity at 6 months (p<0.001). In contrast, NUCYNTA did not show a statistically significant difference in Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for low back pain at any measured interval (p>0.05).
Neuromodulation and surgical interventions provided varied outcomes. Precision SCS was associated with a 35-point reduction in VAS score at 2 weeks post-fitting. However, the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System did not show a statistically significant difference in the relief of back pain or the reduction of disability compared to the control group (p>0.05).
Other pharmacological agents showed specific effects: Duloxetine was associated with a reduction in MADRS scores and McGill Pain Questionnaire scores. Ibuprofen showed a statistically significant improvement in global assessment of efficacy by the patient at the end of treatment (p=0.0045), though it did not significantly change pain on movement or pressure algometry. Cyclobenzaprine HCl showed a statistically significant difference in physician clinical global assessment on day 3 (p=0.0393).
AI synthesis of 0 cited trials, updated Sep 29, 2026. Informational only — not medical advice; trial data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. How we use AI.